Law Society to unveil £4m conveyancing quality scheme to head off competition


Conveyancing: scheme standards to be rigorously enforced

The Law Society will this month unveil a £4m conveyancing quality scheme that aims to help solicitors maintain market share and improve profitability.

At the centre of the scheme will be an updated conveyancing protocol to which all members will have to adhere from 1 April 2011, alongside core practice management standards. The protocol will initially focus on the solicitor-to-solicitor aspects of the conveyancing transaction, but is likely to be expanded as the scheme progresses.

The Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML), Building Societies Association and Association of British Insurers are all said to be supporting the initiative, which a paper submitted to the Law Society’s membership board last month said would cost in the region of £4m. Around 80% of Law Society property section members polled said they would join a scheme of this nature. It should be launched at the section’s conference later this month.

There will be robust monitoring and enforcement of the scheme, which will set standards to test the financial probity of conveyancing firms and those working in them. There will also be identity checking to minimise the risk of bogus firms and individuals. Some 70% of property section members believed that monitoring and enforcement should go beyond that of a standard membership scheme.

Eddie Goldsmith, chairman of the Conveyancing Association, said he applauded the initiative, adding that he welcomed “anything that improves the customer’s journey”.

The membership board paper said it was essential for the society to provide leadership to assist firms in maintaining a leading role in conveyancing: “The property market and solicitors’ involvement in the sale and purchase of residential properties is at a critical stage of development. There has been a significant drop in volume of residential conveyancing transactions, which is having an impact on firms of all sizes but particularly small firms. In addition, a number of factors, including perceptions of poor service, new entrants into the market and overcapacity threaten the solicitors’ share of the conveyancing market.

“The recent cull of lenders’ panels, prompted by perceived underperformance by small and medium-sized firms, and lender fears on mortgage fraud, are also a factor, and the CML is supportive of the scheme as a deterrence and vetting mechanism.”

Tags:




    Readers Comments

  • Forgive me a moments scepticism. £4m pounds to police identity checks and financial probity. How does this go beyond basic elements of membership of the profession? The Law Society has habitually (if understandably) bottled out of serious quality tests through specialisation panels. This is because poorer firms will plead competitive disdvantage and the Law Society feels duty bound to represent all its members. Post-ABS competitive pressures will not be so forgiving. If the protocol represents a serious step forward in terms of efficiency and quality then this proposal is to be welcomed, but a protocol and management standards sounds like a quality test which all-comers can pass.

  • It is good to see the Law Society come out fighting for their members.

    But the scheme seems to presuppose that the future problem for clients in choosing to use law firms will be over their probity. It won’t be.

  • I watched yesterday the Law Society Quality Conveyancing scheme webinar.

    If I were to ask you to buy a car from me (a maker of cars) and I told you that:

    It would be really good

    You just had to have one because if you didn’t you would go nowhere

    And

    I couldn’t be sure how much it would cost:

    I wasn’t sure what mileage you would get out of it

    I didn’t know how it would be maintained or who would do it

    I wasn’t sure what it would look like because I hadn’t made it yet

    Would you buy one?


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Loading animation