Virtual legal business launches US subsidiary


Taylor: Standards & Regulations legitimised what group has been doing

A virtual law business that uniquely combines regulated and unregulated legal practices, with lawyers in the UK and across the world, has launched a subsidiary in the USA.

Robert Taylor, chief executive of 360 Law Group, said the subsidiary was needed “for business rather than legal purposes” to attract more clients in an “enormous” legal market.

The group explicitly offers a regulated law firm, an alternative business structure called 360 Law Services, to handle reserved legal work, and an unregulated firm, 360 Business & Private Client Law, for everything else.

Mr Taylor, a barrister who worked in-house, said the group has over 200 consultants in more than 50 countries around the world, all of whom were experienced lawyers.

He described the 360 Group as unlike other virtual law firms in the UK, which tended to “bring in as many consultants as they can” because the consultants provided the work.

“We do things the other way round. We have the clients and contract with them. We are drawn to increase our consultants by our client base.”

Mr Taylor said the Standards and Regulations, introduced by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) in November last year, had “legitimised” what the group had been doing for the previous six years.

Under a unique structure agreed with the SRA, the firm’s solicitors and barristers were previously described as ‘legal counsel’. Now he said solicitors could sign themselves off as solicitors, and the fact they were individually regulated by the SRA would give “added protection” to clients.

Mr Taylor said the firm’s consultants in the USA, Canada, Mexico and the rest of Latin America would transfer to 360 Business Law America, which has opened an office in Washington.

He said the same approach would be applied to Australia, where an office would be opening soon to cover not only Australia but also South-East Asia.

With the group getting “more and more business” from the USA, there was a need for greater administrative control.

The subsidiary is headed by J Benjamin Lambert, a US attorney who worked for Baker McKenzie, and has practiced in compliance, technology and commercial law.

Mr Lambert said businesses had “a real need for this type of service where they can receive high quality legal advice, but with significant cost savings”.

Mr Taylor said he had “no doubt at all” that the coronavirus pandemic would permanently change the way lawyers worked.

The group introduced a pioneering video-signing service for statutory documents which led Companies House to confirm that it will now accept declarations of solvency sworn by video. Mr Taylor said the approach was likely to be extended to other documents such as wills

He predicted that the crisis would lead to more working from home and the structure of legal services would change over time.

“Smaller is more beautiful,” he said. “Small firms are more agile and can move more quickly.

“Big law firms have huge premises and cannot retract quickly enough.”




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Five key issues to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech

As generative AI starts to play a bigger role in our working lives, there are some key issues that your law firm needs to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech.


Bulk litigation – not always working in consumers interests

For consumers to get the benefit, bulk litigation needs to be done well, and we are increasingly concerned that there are significant problems in some areas of this market.


ABSs, cost and audits – fixing regulation after Axiom Ince

A feature of law firm collapses and frauds has sometimes been the over-concentration of power in outdated and overburdened systems of control.


Loading animation