Tribunal requires overseas litigation funder to abide by ALF code


Cryptocurrency: £10bn claim

The Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) has made an overseas funder’s compliance with key parts of the Association of Litigation Funders’ code of conduct a condition of granting a collective proceedings order.

Softwhale Holdings is funding UK litigation for the first time and is not a member of the association.

But it said from an early stage that it would voluntarily comply with the code’s requirements in relation to capital adequacy and case funding and the CAT has stitched this into the fabric of the BSV claim in a ruling late last month.

The CAT said it would grant the order once receiving the undertaking, “subject to any points which would cause us to reconsider”.

The claim alleges that four leading cryptocurrency exchanges – Binance, Bittylicious, Kraken and Shapeshift – colluded to delist cryptocurrency Bitcoin Satoshi Vision (BSV) in 2019.

It is estimated that more than 240,000 investors in the UK suffered losses of around £10bn.

The class representative is Lord Currie, chief executive of BSV Claims and a former chair of the Competition & Markets Authority, while former Lord Chancellor Robert Buckland KC is on the advisory board. London disputes law firm Veltior Law is acting for Lord Currie.

Softwhale Ventures is part of the Ayre Group, owned by Canadian online gambling billionaire Calvin Ayre, who is also active in bitcoin and blockchain.

The CAT ruling said that, while there was “extensive correspondence” from the proposed defendants taking points of objection to the funding arrangements, they did not pursue them at the hearing.

The original litigation funding agreement was entered into in July 2022 and had to be redrawn following last year’s Supreme Court ruling in PACCAR. It provides up to £18.6m of funding, with Softwhale’s fee calculated by reference to a multiple of the total funding commitment, which the CAT had confirmed did not fall foul of PACCAR.

Softwhale’s performance of the agreement is guaranteed by Mt Burgos Holdings Ltd, up to more than £9.8m.

The CAT recorded that there was also after-the-event insurance in place, providing cover of £2m up to certification and £14m post-certification. The policy includes an anti-avoidance endorsement.

If the policy proves insufficient to cover any adverse costs order, a deposit of £5m cash is held in the claim trust account, and the funding agreement includes an undertaking to ensure that the account is maintained at a minimum level of £5m.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Five key issues to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech

As generative AI starts to play a bigger role in our working lives, there are some key issues that your law firm needs to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech.


Bulk litigation – not always working in consumers interests

For consumers to get the benefit, bulk litigation needs to be done well, and we are increasingly concerned that there are significant problems in some areas of this market.


ABSs, cost and audits – fixing regulation after Axiom Ince

A feature of law firm collapses and frauds has sometimes been the over-concentration of power in outdated and overburdened systems of control.


Loading animation