Trainee falsified LPC certificate to trick SRA


SRA: Banning order

A trainee solicitor who applied to join the roll with a falsified certificate that he had passed the legal practice course (LPC) has been banned from the profession.

Kulvinder Kooner, who worked at Surrey law firm Preuveneers, cannot work in future for a law firm without the permission of the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).

According to a regulatory settlement agreement published today, in May 2019 Mr Kooner applied to be admitted to the roll of solicitors and for a practising certificate.

The SRA asked him for a copy of the certificate showing he had completed and passed the LPC, which he sent. He had been studying the LPC while working at the firm.

The SRA then asked for a “clearer copy” of the certificate, but he did not reply and instead soon after withdrew the application, stating that he no longer wanted to pursue a career as a solicitor.

The same day, Preuveneers contacted the SRA to report that Mr Kooner had admitted falsifying the certificate.

Mr Kooner admitted that his dishonest conduct made it “undesirable” for him to be involved in a legal practice.

In mitigation, the SRA noted that he apologised and expressed remorse for his conduct, and cooperated with its investigation.

The banning order was appropriate because “his conduct demonstrates that, were Mr Kooner to be involved in a legal practice again, he could not be trusted to act honestly in the delivery of legal services”.

In a statement, Preuveneers said: “Mr Kooner joined the firm as a paralegal, confirmed to us that he passed the LPC and provided us with the transcript [mark sheet]. He applied to become a trainee solicitor, which was approved by the Law Society.

“As soon as we become aware of the situation, Mr Kooner’s employment was immediately terminated and we contacted the SRA on the same day. We have fully cooperated with the Law Society in its investigation.”




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Mind the (justice) gap: Why are RTAs going up but claims still down?

The gap between the number of road traffic accident injuries and the number of motor injury claims continues to widen, according to the latest government data.


Five key issues to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech

As generative AI starts to play a bigger role in our working lives, there are some key issues that your law firm needs to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech.


Bulk litigation – not always working in consumers interests

For consumers to get the benefit, bulk litigation needs to be done well, and we are increasingly concerned that there are significant problems in some areas of this market.


Loading animation