Top family solicitor opts for BSB entity regulation


Pratley: Access to Bar Mutual a benefit

The former national head of family law at Simpson Millar has set up his own firm and chosen to be regulated by the Bar Standards Board (BSB).

John Pratley said the Bar regulator was a “good fit” for the business because it is “court-facing” and has little need of a client account.

Mr Pratley was a partner at Bristol firm Foster and Partners, which was founded in 1976 and bought by Simpson Millar in 2014. Initially head of family for Bristol and Cardiff, he then became national head.

His BSB entity, Apple Tree Family Law in Tiverton, Devon, was authorised last month. Since 2015, 93 entities have chosen BSB regulation, including others run by solicitors.

Speaking to Legal Futures, Mr Pratley said he believed family law was better delivered from a small firm and “the client I think benefits from having that much more individual approach”.

After consulting others who had opted for BSB regulation and spoken positively about their experience, he was convinced. The BSB was an “appropriate regulator”, as it was used to dealing with sole practitioners, he said.

He said the BSB was selective in who it authorised, preferring to regulate low-risk practitioners who did not handle client funds.

An advantage of being regulated by the BSB, he said, was that he had access to the Bar Mutual indemnity insurance scheme: “It has a very good reputation as an insurer and the premiums are lower as well.”

He said the BSB was a good regulator for “a small firm that is very involved in court-facing work; litigation and advice relating to litigation”.

Mr Pratley said he had put “a lot of preparation time” into making his application – between two and three weeks’ solid work in all.

He added: “It was a clear process and the people I dealt with were constructive, intelligent and reasonably supportive.

“I wouldn’t say it was an easy application to make but my impression was that the BSB handle these things very well and reasonably quickly.

“I put in my application in August and, after giving a positive preliminary indication within a week or so, the firm was approved in mid-October. So I felt they were prompt.”

He observed: “There just aren’t that many barristers so the whole thing is smaller scale and more personal.”

He concluded: “If I were to talk to somebody else who was contemplating making the same step, I would recommend them to think about going the same way.”




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Five key issues to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech

As generative AI starts to play a bigger role in our working lives, there are some key issues that your law firm needs to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech.


Bulk litigation – not always working in consumers interests

For consumers to get the benefit, bulk litigation needs to be done well, and we are increasingly concerned that there are significant problems in some areas of this market.


ABSs, cost and audits – fixing regulation after Axiom Ince

A feature of law firm collapses and frauds has sometimes been the over-concentration of power in outdated and overburdened systems of control.


Loading animation