The Law Superstore relaunches 18 months after takeover


Houghton: Comparison sites hard to do well

Legal comparison website The Law Superstore (TLS) this week relaunched after spending more than a year switching from offering panel solicitors’ firms solid instructions to a simpler, lower-cost lead-generating model.

Conveyancing comparison site reallymoving.com purchased TLS in August 2017 and it now offers more than 130 services in 12 areas of practice.

Under the new model, enquiring web users answer some questions about their issue and then receive up to four quotes from ‘matched provider’ law firms, detailing the service and a price.

If the user selects one, they are put in touch with the solicitor. TLS has no further involvement in any subsequent instruction.

TLS chief executive Rob Houghton said that, while the combined panels of reallymoving and TLS had more than 100 law firms, this was skewed towards the former.

But the number of TLS firms was “growing reasonably rapidly and we haven’t really started marketing it yet”.

Under the old model, firm were charged by direct debit as if each lead was an instruction and refunded if the client did not proceed.

Mr Houghton described that model as “painful” and stressed it was “not working”.

He said that since the old model was ditched, participating firms paid around 90% less for leads, reflecting the fact that most enquiries did not convert into paid instructions and that other firms were quoting as well.

He reported conversion rates were around 10%, but said they could go far higher. Prices for leads started from around £2 for a low complexity will.

TLS visitors choosing conveyancing services were handled seamlessly by the reallymoving infrastructure.

He said regulated legal services, which for regulatory reasons had to be done under the old model, did not currently appear on TLS: “We’re not expecting to gain significant revenues from those regulated services but we will make them live again at some point so we have a full range of services on the site.”

Mr Houghton said competition from other comparison sites was not a problem. “The thing about comparison websites is it’s incredibly easy to build a basic site but it’s really, really hard to make it stick.

“Building up a panel of people who want to work with you and trust you is a hugely non-trivial undertaking.”




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Five key issues to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech

As generative AI starts to play a bigger role in our working lives, there are some key issues that your law firm needs to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech.


Bulk litigation – not always working in consumers interests

For consumers to get the benefit, bulk litigation needs to be done well, and we are increasingly concerned that there are significant problems in some areas of this market.


ABSs, cost and audits – fixing regulation after Axiom Ince

A feature of law firm collapses and frauds has sometimes been the over-concentration of power in outdated and overburdened systems of control.


Loading animation