Suspended barrister warns over “innocent conversations about hobbies”


Photography: Barrister’s “escape into an artistic world”

The barrister suspended for two years after showing his photography website to a woman and offering to take unclothed photos of her has said it was “an innocent discussion”.

Alan Wheetman described the decision as “a warning” to amateur photographers working in regulated professions.

We reported earlier this week that, according to the Bar Standards Board (BSB), a disciplinary tribunal found Mr Wheetman guilty of making “inappropriate comments and behaviour of a sexual nature made towards a female involved in a case he was instructed in at a magistrates’ court in August 2022”.

It explained: “Mr Wheetman showed his photography website to the individual, which included semi-nude images, and offered to take photos of her, with the suggestion this could be without clothing.”

The tribunal ordered the BSB not to issue him with a practising certificate for 24 months. The full ruling has not yet been released, which is when the time for appeal begins to run.

Norfolk-based Mr Wheetman has a portfolio on a website called PurplePort, which connects photographers with models. His photos are a mix of artistic-style nude, topless, bikini and clothed images of women.

He describes photography as “my escape into an artistic world where I meet like-minded people, and work with creative, talented models – whatever their experience”.

He has added this week that the tribunal decision should “serve as a warning to all photographers who are employed or working in a regulated profession”.

Reproducing the BSB press release, Mr Wheetman explained that he had been talking to the woman about modelling.

“Please be very careful when engaging people in discussions about modelling or showing any images from your portfolio to anybody in the workplace,” he wrote.

“What may be viewed by some as an innocent discussion about your hobby or pastime, can so readily be interpreted by others as ‘inappropriate comments and behaviour of a sexual nature’.”




    Readers Comments

  • Alan Wheetman says:

    It is refreshing to read such a balanced report of my situation from Neil Rose at Legalfutures.

    Thank you, Neil.

  • Marc Beaumont says:

    That is a very severe sanction for revealing a genuine interest in an art form, quite apart from the Article 10 implications. We do not know the full facts. I hope this gentleman did not try to represent himself.

  • Anthony James McCarthy says:

    Article includes an actual link to the said website (for now anyway)

  • Alan Wheetman says:

    It is said that ‘the lawyer who represents himself has a fool for a client.’ I was very capably and professionally represented by Mr. Stuart Brady of Farrar’s Buikdings Chambers under a Direct Public Access to the Bar agreement. Mr. Brady has my full endorsement and recommendation.


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


AI in the legal profession: how soon will it make an impact?

The extent and speed of AI’s integration depend on technological developments, regulatory frameworks and the willingness of lawyers to embrace AI-driven solutions.


Why now is the right time for mentoring in lawtech

Having previously been perceived as the poor relation to fintech, lawtech in 2025 is enjoying the huge attention it is now attracting, with recent headlines describing this moment as its ‘Golden Age’.


Digital marketing for law firms in 2025

While some of your existing marketing tactics will continue to work, the online space you are targeting is bound to some serious change, so it’s up to you to follow these trends.


Loading animation
loading