Struck-off solicitor jailed for stealing £880,000 from clients


Hallows: Struck off in 2020

A struck-off solicitor has been jailed for nearly six years for defrauding clients of £880,000, which he used to prop up his practice and pay off loans.

Richard Hallows, 66, pleaded guilty to fraud by abuse of position and was sentenced at Caernarfon Crown Court on Friday to five years and 10 months in prison.

Police investigated five separate complaints of fraudulent activity, with £600,000 the highest individual loss.

That client was given numerous excuses by Mr Hallows for why he could not return the money, including missing a plane and train, that his ex-wife had collapsed, his daughter was in surgery and that the bank needed seven working days to process the request. The funds were not returned.

Another client appointed Mr Hallows as an executor of estate worth £143,000 following a family member’s death and again he gave numerous excuses for not distributing the estate to the family.

Mr Hallows qualified in 1983 and was the sole solicitor and proprietor of the Mold firm Hallows Associates, where he handled commercial litigation, commercial property and conveyancing work. The Solicitors Regulation Authority shut it down in February 2018.

The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal struck off Mr Hallows in 2020, finding that he operated “a system of teeming and lading” – the practice of using funds in one account to replace the money taken from another – with hundreds of thousands of pounds in various accounts.

There was a pattern of ‘rubber’ cheques for large sums being paid into client account from the company owned by his wife and then being returned unpaid within a short period of time.

The tribunal said this was “a device… artificially to inflate the balance on the client account” to make it look like there was no shortfall and conceal the withdrawals he had made.

According to a local newspaper report, prosecutor Nicola Daley told the court that between 2016 and 2018 Mr Hallows used the money to “prop up” the running of his office and “pay off loans” he owed.

One of the clients, whose proceeds of a property sale Mr Hallows misused, told the court that but for a payout from the SRA Compensation Funding, their business would have collapsed.

Judge Timothy Petts said the “selfish” solicitor had shown “a total lack of remorse”, adding: “You’ve never had any excuse or defence but, rather than face up to what you did at an earlier stage, you simply held out ’til the day of the trial when everything had caught up with you.”

Detective Constable David Hall, of North Wales Police’s economic crime unit, said: “His behaviour has left a trail of destruction for victims who placed their trust in him and the professional services he claimed to offer.”

Claire Busby, specialist prosecutor at the Crown Prosecution Service, said “Hallows abused his position of trust as a solicitor for his own personal gain and in doing so, put his clients at risk of huge financial loss. Confiscation proceedings will be pursued against Mr Hallows.”




    Readers Comments

  • MR DONALD R MACLEOD says:

    A disgrace to the profession.

  • Denny Obrien says:

    Im in a similar situation with a rogue solicitor

  • Abdul says:

    absolutely a disgusting person hope he gets all that is coming to him in prison .just greedy

  • Wendy Brookes says:

    Same situation some years ago totally ruined my life practically lost every thing I had worked very hard for after a divorce (his adultery.) . solicitor said in court he thought i was a friend very surprised i had complained about him he was struck off but that didnt get my money back something in the region of £80.000 due from the sale of my house after trying for 3yrs my health took a turn for the worse and as a consequence has continued to decline and I am quite sure all down to stress caused by a so called professional????

  • Brian Seadon says:

    It’s difficult to understand why so many lawyers, so called ‘professionals’, are crooks. I have seen so many cases during my time in Shropshire. Lawyers certainly aren’t good at looking after money, that’s for sure!

  • Pete Anderson says:

    Did you ever get anything back as you should have been reimbursed by the Solicitors Conduct Authority? If not, that situation is wrong.


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Mind the (justice) gap: Why are RTAs going up but claims still down?

The gap between the number of road traffic accident injuries and the number of motor injury claims continues to widen, according to the latest government data.


Five key issues to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech

As generative AI starts to play a bigger role in our working lives, there are some key issues that your law firm needs to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech.


Bulk litigation – not always working in consumers interests

For consumers to get the benefit, bulk litigation needs to be done well, and we are increasingly concerned that there are significant problems in some areas of this market.


Loading animation