SRA to contact dozens of immigration solicitors over competence


Immigration: Vital for solicitors to keep up-to-date

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) is contacting a group of immigration and asylum solicitors whose training records did not provide “sufficient assurances” that they are maintaining their competence.

A review of the training records of 143 solicitors in the field from 60 firms found that all had undertaken “some learning and development” but there was “room for improvement” because almost a third simply listed what they had done, rather than recording why learning and development was required.

The regulator said some “excellent training records” showed good practice by “comprehensively describing how the individual had reflected and identified their learning and development needs” and “clearly explaining the activity carried out and how it addressed the identified need”.

These records were “often linked to a training template that outlined the competencies in our statement of solicitor competence” or the law firm’s own internal competencies.

“Other records were less comprehensive. Those of 46 solicitors simply listed the learning and development carried out – for example, the name of the course and when it was completed.

“There was no evidence of how or why the learning and development was required or whether the activity had addressed the original need.”

These solicitors “did not provide us with sufficient assurances are maintaining their competence”.

Each would be contacted “to explain what we expect in a training record and understand the steps they are taking” to maintain competence.

“We will also contact the firm employing each solicitor to understand and assess the policies and processes they have in place to ensure competence of their solicitors.”

The SRA said it would “explore if further regulatory intervention is required in this area, informed by our follow-up firm inspections and ongoing monitoring of reports”.

Only 37 solicitors used the SRA’s immigration and asylum guidance and resources to help address their needs.

The SRA said immigration and asylum could be “a complex, fast-paced and politically sensitive area of law” with vulnerable clients, and it was “vital” that lawyers kept their knowledge and skills up to date.

“To do this, we expect solicitors to regularly reflect on their practice and identify and address their training needs.”

All of the records showed that some learning and development had been carried out, with 41 solicitors recording one to five activities, 35 solicitors six to 10 and 67 solicitors more than 10.

While it is “not a regulatory requirement to keep a training record or document reflection”, the SRA said it demonstrated that solicitors had taken the necessary steps to keep knowledge and skills up to date.

“A failure to record reflection raises concerns that not all needs are being identified and addressed. We therefore expect to see evidence of reflection in training records, not just a list of activities.”

As to future activities they needed to keep skills and knowledge up-to-date, solicitors identified “a better understanding of the operation and impact of a digitised immigration system” and improving communication with vulnerable clients.

Solicitors also noted needs beyond their sector, such as a better understanding of legal case management systems, the GDPR and the solicitors’ accounts rules.

A separate review by the SRA of 25 law firms specialising in asylum work last week painted an overall positive picture of their work, while its annual review of continuing competence, also last week, reported a fall in the number of reports about immigration specialists.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Five key issues to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech

As generative AI starts to play a bigger role in our working lives, there are some key issues that your law firm needs to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech.


Bulk litigation – not always working in consumers interests

For consumers to get the benefit, bulk litigation needs to be done well, and we are increasingly concerned that there are significant problems in some areas of this market.


ABSs, cost and audits – fixing regulation after Axiom Ince

A feature of law firm collapses and frauds has sometimes been the over-concentration of power in outdated and overburdened systems of control.


Loading animation