SRA to appeal decision to clear Dentons over AML breaches


Dentons: Breach not systemic, tribunal held

The High Court looks set to rule on whether a tribunal was right to find that Dentons’ breach of the anti-money laundering (AML) rules was “inadvertent” and did not amount to professional misconduct.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) announced on Friday that it is to appeal the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal’s (SDT) decision to clear the world’s largest law firm, having found that it relied on what it was told by the relationship partner who had brought the client, a politically exposed person, over from Salans when it merged with Dentons in 2013.

The tribunal said: “It was plain that the breach was not systemic, indeed, the firm had been commended by the SRA for its AML systems and controls.”

It decided that the breach fell within “the small category of cases where wrongdoing did not amount to professional misconduct”.

The SRA has not yet disclosed the grounds for appeal, which could also feature the SDT’s refusal of the regulator’s claim for costs, nor made any other comment.

Dentons had no comment in response to the announcement but said in a statement following publication of the tribunal’s written reasons last month: “The SRA’s own guidance to the profession is that there may be breaches of the MLRs that are not sufficiently serious to warrant disciplinary action.

“We are pleased that the SDT found that any breach of the MLRs had been inadvertent, did not amount to professional misconduct and that there had been no breach of the principles or code. The SDT also recognised that we not only had relevant and responsible AML policies in place, but that we enforced those policies.

“We recognise that risk management and regulatory compliance requires constant vigilance and attention and, since the period in question, we have significantly enhanced our capabilities and procedures.

“We have co-operated with the SRA throughout its investigation and remain committed to upholding the highest standards of professional conduct.”




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Why you should be using AI – but for the boring stuff

The legal industry is excited about AI. That’s good. But the direction of that excitement isn’t always useful. It’s the really dull tasks where AI could make a visible difference quickly.


Building your law firm’s generative AI strategy

It’s understandable that fully integrating GenAI within any business can feel daunting. This is why the focus should be on having a vision and starting the journey now.


Why better domestic abuse screening in mediation is long overdue

If there’s one thing the legal profession could do today, it would be to make domestic abuse and safeguarding training mandatory for all family lawyers and mediators.


Loading animation
loading