SRA issues first fixed penalty fine for diversity data failure


Diversity: Firm required to provide workforce data

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has handed out the first fixed penalty fine for a law firm’s failure to submit its workforce diversity data within the deadline.

Leicester firm HG Legal has been fined £750, with costs of £150, for failing to comply with the SRA’s request, made under paragraph 1.5 of its code of conduct for firms, which requires them to “monitor, report and publish workforce diversity data, as prescribed”.

Firms are required to respond to SRA requests like this under paragraph 3.3(a) of the code. HG Legal has now done so.

Fixed penalties form part of the SRA’s new fining powers introduced in 2022 and are published on the SRA website. They are being piloted with a small number of lower-level breaches breaches by firms; in November, three firms that failed to comply with the transparency rules became the first to receive fixed £750 fines under the regime.

As well as the transparency rules and failing to provide information or documentation requested or required by the SRA – a declaration of compliance with anti-money laundering requirements is another example – failing to ensure approval of role holders like compliance officers can also lead to a fixed penalty.

A second offence within three years leads to a £1,500 fine.

The SRA is set to consult this year on fixed penalties for minor anti-money laundering system and control failings, although the amount of the fine could be higher.

The regulator published its biennial collection of the profession’s diversity data last month, reporting on a “slow but steady increase in diversity among all lawyers”, but especially among smaller law firms.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Mind the (justice) gap: Why are RTAs going up but claims still down?

The gap between the number of road traffic accident injuries and the number of motor injury claims continues to widen, according to the latest government data.


Five key issues to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech

As generative AI starts to play a bigger role in our working lives, there are some key issues that your law firm needs to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech.


Bulk litigation – not always working in consumers interests

For consumers to get the benefit, bulk litigation needs to be done well, and we are increasingly concerned that there are significant problems in some areas of this market.


Loading animation