SRA: Firms can prolong extended PII cover with agreement


PII: Solicitors need waiver to extend period

Law firms unable to secure professional indemnity insurance (PII) because of Covid-19 can prolong the extended indemnity period by agreement and with regulatory approval, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) said yesterday.

Firms unable to obtain a new policy go into the extended indemnity period under their existing policy, made up of a 30-day extended policy period (EPP) and then a 60-day cessation period (CP).

By the end of these 90 days, firms have either to obtain cover or close.

In guidance published yesterday, the SRA said it knew that some firms whose renewal date passed during the crisis have not been able to secure PII because of “practical difficulties”.

For example, some firms have had problems contacting their broker because their operations have been suspended, others have seen key personnel unable to complete the renewal process due to illness/being hospitalised/caring responsibilities, while a further group needed more time to get finance in place to pay for premiums, including potentially access to government Covid-19 support.

In such situations, the regulator said, firms “may be able to agree” with their insurer an extension of the EPP, CP or both. If the insurer agrees, the firm then has to apply to the SRA for a waiver from provisions in the SRA indemnity insurance rules.

The SRA said: “Insurers can ask that as a condition of any extension to the EPP or CP that you pay any premium due up front.

“You will need to confirm any payment arrangements with them and confirm in your waiver application that you have or will make payment to the insurer for any additional premium for the extension.”

Firms that cannot agree an extension and reach the end of the 90 days must notify the SRA and close.

Law Society president Simon Davis welcomed the move, for which he said Chancery Lane had lobbied. “The insurance market was already hardening before the before the pandemic, and the lockdown seems likely to throw up new problems for firms trying to secure the requisite cover,” he said.

“The SRA’s speedy and positive action creates space for firms to arrange extra time to resolve issues. A good example of close consultation working to the benefit of the profession and public.”




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Five key issues to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech

As generative AI starts to play a bigger role in our working lives, there are some key issues that your law firm needs to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech.


Bulk litigation – not always working in consumers interests

For consumers to get the benefit, bulk litigation needs to be done well, and we are increasingly concerned that there are significant problems in some areas of this market.


ABSs, cost and audits – fixing regulation after Axiom Ince

A feature of law firm collapses and frauds has sometimes been the over-concentration of power in outdated and overburdened systems of control.


Loading animation