SRA fines firm £5k for persistent anti-money laundering failures


AML: Non-compliance dates back to 2017

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has continued to flex its new fining powers by issuing a £5,000 penalty against a law firm for six years of anti-money laundering failures.

North Yorkshire firm Goad & Butcher has also had conditions imposed on its authorisation after previous efforts to bring it into compliance failed.

The SRA said the firm, based in Settle, had since June 2017 failed to have in place a documented and compliant firm-wide risk assessment or compliant policies, controls and procedures (PCPs), contrary to the 2017 Money Laundering Regulations.

This was aggravated by the fact that the firm had not complied with the terms of a compliance plan agreed with the SRA back in June 2021.

The SRA said the firm’s conduct was “a wilful breach of its regulatory obligations which has persisted for more than five years” and had the potential “to cause significant harm to the public interest and to public confidence in the legal profession”.

Conditions on Goad & Butcher’s authorisation were necessary to monitor its compliance with the 2017 regulations.

“The long-standing and persistent nature of Goad & Butcher’s failure to comply with the MLRs 2017 indicated that its breaches related to systemic issues within the firm,” the SRA said.

“Its conduct is likely to be repeated in the absence of conditions. This is demonstrated by its failure to ensure compliance since 26 June 2017 despite the engagement and support provided by the SRA to assist it to comply.”

The conditions require the firm to produce a revised and compliant firm-wide risk assessment and update its anti-money laundering PCPs, and provide them to the SRA within a month.




    Readers Comments

  • Mac McCaskill says:

    £5k for 6 years of MLA non-compliance?
    Wow! That’ll teach ’em, won’t it?
    A late April Fool, or another joke decision from the often invisible and frequently inept SRA?


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Time to get real: Why authenticity should be at the heart of your marketing

Authenticity is becoming an increasingly important part of marketing. Glossy adverts are no longer enough; these days consumers want to connect with brands on a more personal level.


Why it’s time to embrace health justice partnerships

In July, I completed a second-year evaluation of a health justice project in Australia amid the continuing interest in England and Wales in co-locating health and legal services.


What does the SRA’s consumer protection review mean for law firms?

Practitioners need to be aware of the SRA’s increasing oversight of firms, especially those considering mergers, acquisitions, or private equity investment activity.


Loading animation