SRA finally moves to shut down Axiom Ince


Ince: The end of a venerable City name

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has today closed down Axiom Ince, the scandal-hit law firm that was on the verge of collapse.

The regulator said the move was “to protect the interests of clients and former clients of the firm”.

It follows the closures of the individual practices of chief executive Pragnesh Modhwadia, and fellow partners Idnan Liaqat and Shyam Mistry.

The firm had just filed a notice of intention to appoint administrators in any case, while the SRA has reported concerns to the Metropolitan Police.

The intervention covers 14 offices across the country given Axiom Ince’s recent acquisitions of Ince & Co and Plexus Law in pre-pack sales for £2.2m and £1.1m respectively.

“As there are on-going investigations related to this matter, no further details can be disclosed,” the SRA said. “It is only if further action become necessary that any information is released into the public domain. There is no timescale for how long this work will take.”

Mr Modhwadia’s practice was shut on the grounds that there was “reason to suspect dishonesty” on his part as well as breaches of other rules.

At a recent High Court hearing, he admitted that about £64m had been taken from Axiom’s client account in part to buy Ince & Co and Plexus Law, and also buy six properties and renovate a further seven.

One of his solicitors told Legal Futures that Axiom Ince should have sufficient assets to meet the claims for the missing money.

Speaking at an SRA media briefing last week, chief executive Paul Philip said the regulator had “done everything it should have”, explaining that it had probed the goings-on at the firm “because it is unusual for a small firm to take over a large firm”.

The SRA did not intervene in the whole firm in August, when it acted against the three individuals “because it appeared to be a deliberate act of dishonesty and the other partners had nothing to do with it”.

It is this that might prevent claims on the SRA Compensation Fund, as a firm’s professional indemnity insurance should cover losses where there are innocent partners to another’s default.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Mind the (justice) gap: Why are RTAs going up but claims still down?

The gap between the number of road traffic accident injuries and the number of motor injury claims continues to widen, according to the latest government data.


Five key issues to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech

As generative AI starts to play a bigger role in our working lives, there are some key issues that your law firm needs to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech.


Bulk litigation – not always working in consumers interests

For consumers to get the benefit, bulk litigation needs to be done well, and we are increasingly concerned that there are significant problems in some areas of this market.


Loading animation