Solicitor rebuked after client’s appeal not submitted


Court of Appeal: Solicitor did not check appeal had been received

A solicitor who failed to check that a criminal client’s appeal had been lodged at the Court of Appeal has been rebuked after it turned out that it had not been.

As a result, the appeal was out of time.

Charles Westwood, who was dismissed by Irwin Mitchell, accepted the sanction in a regulatory settlement agreement with the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).

An SRA notice said Mr Westwood was instructed to submit an appeal against sentence, for which he had 28 days from the date of the sentencing hearing.

He prepared the appeal documentation in conjunction with counsel and believed that he submitted it by email.

“He confirmed that it was not unusual to have no further update or notification from the court for some time after filing the appeal,” the SRA said.

Mr Westwood did not then check receipt of the appeal with the court, nor his file or the firm’s case management system to verify that he had sent it by the deadline.

“Despite not carrying out these checks, he told several interested parties that he had submitted the appeal to the court. He later found out that because he had not submitted the appeal by the deadline, his client’s opportunity to appeal was out of time.”

Irwin Mitchell later dismissed him following a disciplinary investigation.

Mr Westwood admitted that he did not ensure that the service provided to the client was competent and delivered in a timely manner, failed to uphold public trust and confidence, and failed to act in the best interests of his client.

In mitigation, the solicitor said he cooperated fully with the SRA investigation and shown “insight and remorse” for his actions. Further, “his conduct was isolated to that client matter alone and he has not acted in that way before or since”.

The SRA said a rebuke was appropriate given that his behaviour was “reckless as Mr Westwood should have checked that such an important submission to the Court of Appeal had been received and that the updates he provided to interested parties was an accurate reflection of the status of the appeal”.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Jeff Zindani

Navigating M&A in PI and clin neg: The changing game

Consolidation has swept the PI and clinical negligence markets, accelerating mergers and acquisitions. The entry of private equity, once seen as unlikely in claimant work, changed the game.


Physical access to the courts needs to be improved

We try and use the law to mend and heal them. Being made uncomfortable in court because buildings are not properly adapted or equipped makes an already challenging day even more difficult.


The end of Google’s dominance: A new era in search

The rise of alternative search platforms like TikTok, the emergence of AI-driven tools like ChatGPT, and the development of federated search by Apple are signalling the end of Google’s unchallenged reign.


Loading animation