Solicitor and barrister both sanctioned for drink driving


Caught: Lengthy bans for lawyers

A solicitor and barrister have separately been sanctioned for drink-drive offences, although only the latter appeared before a disciplinary tribunal.

Jasbinder Digva, a non-practising solicitor, avoided a tribunal by entering into a regulatory settlement agreement with the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).

Under this, she was rebuked and fined £1,000.

The agreement said she “drove home from a social event with her young daughter in the car” but was involved in a collision with another car at a junction on the way.

Ms Digva was convicted at Nottingham Magistrates’ Court last year of driving with excess alcohol, and sentenced to a 24-month disqualification and fine of £240.

In the agreement, she admitted that “by her conduct and conviction for driving with excess alcohol, she behaved in a way that may diminish the trust the public places in her and the provision of legal services”.

Ms Digva did not report the conviction to the regulator, which was also a breach of the rules.

The SRA said the penalty imposed was appropriate because “the conduct was deliberate or reckless and affected or had the potential to affect a child”, and was “a proportionate outcome in the public interest”.

It had taken into account the admissions made by Ms Digva and “that she was suffering from difficult personal circumstances at the time of the conduct which led to the conviction”.

Barrister Peter Moss was convicted of drink driving at Chester Magistrates’ Court two years ago. He was banned from driving for 40 months and ordered to undertake 100 hours of community work.

A Bar disciplinary tribunal ordered that Mr Moss, who was called in 1980, could not renew his practising certificate until 1 February 2019 and fined him £2,500, suspended until the same date.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Five key issues to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech

As generative AI starts to play a bigger role in our working lives, there are some key issues that your law firm needs to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech.


Bulk litigation – not always working in consumers interests

For consumers to get the benefit, bulk litigation needs to be done well, and we are increasingly concerned that there are significant problems in some areas of this market.


ABSs, cost and audits – fixing regulation after Axiom Ince

A feature of law firm collapses and frauds has sometimes been the over-concentration of power in outdated and overburdened systems of control.


Loading animation