Leading unrated indemnity insurer withdraws from market


Jason Smart

Smart: “increasing number” of fraud attacks

Elite Insurance, one of only three unrated indemnity insurers of law firms and the only one based in Britain, announced yesterday that it is leaving the market.

The move leaves only two unrated firms on the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s list of qualifying indemnity insurers – Alpha Insurance, based in Denmark and Enterprise Insurance, based in Gibraltar.

Elite cited a range of reasons for its decision, including “increased propensity to fraud on solicitors’ client accounts”, the government’s proposed increase in the small claims limit for personal injury cases, and falling premiums.

Jason Smart, chief executive of Elite, said: “Elite entered into the solicitors’ PII market in 2012 and has built up a considerable reputation as a serious player, despite being constantly attacked for being an unrated insurer.

“However, recently some rated insurers have reduced premium rates to a level which Elite believes are unsustainable, which is ironic as unrated insurers are often accused of discounting rates.

“The minimum terms require coverage of losses on solicitors’ client accounts by, inter alia, fraud attacks. We have seen an increasing number of such attacks and feel these are not likely to abate. This risk is beyond the control of our underwriting team.”

Mr Smart said Elite believed the increase in the small claims limit for personal injury cases to £5,000, announced in the chancellor’s Autumn Statement, would “have an adverse effect on our target market of personal injury solicitors”.

Mr Smart said the decision had not been taken “lightly”, but it would allow the insurer to concentrate on “strong growth in its remaining markets throughout Europe”.

Elite said that all its existing insurance policies would continue until expiry but that renewal terms will not be offered.

In a separate development, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has fined Shay Reches, director with insurance intermediary Coverall Worldwide Limited, £1.05m.

The FCA said Mr Reches, had also agreed to pay £13.1m to three collapsed indemnity insurers. Two of them, the European Risk Insurance Company (ERIC), based in Iceland, and Balva, based in Latvia, insured law firms.

Misconduct by Mr Reches was said by the FCA to have contributed to the three insurers going into administration, and resulted in the Financial Services Compensation Scheme having to pay claims totalling £12.7m by the end of last year.

Mark Steward, director of enforcement and market oversight at the FCA, said: “This was a hugely complex case, with the FCA liaising with over 20 regulators and agencies around the world.

“Mr Reches’ misconduct led to many solicitors and others being left without adequate insurance. He treated policyholders’ funds and their interests with reckless indifference and his misconduct was facilitated by an absence of proper controls by key persons at important stages of the insurance process.”

Tags:




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


The lonely role of a COFA: sharing the burden of risk management

Compliance officers for finance and administration in law firms can often find themselves walking a solitary path. But what if we could create a collaborative culture of shared accountability?


Mind the (justice) gap: Why are RTAs going up but claims still down?

The gap between the number of road traffic accident injuries and the number of motor injury claims continues to widen, according to the latest government data.


Five key issues to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech

As generative AI starts to play a bigger role in our working lives, there are some key issues that your law firm needs to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech.


Loading animation