Law Society plots paralegal accreditation scheme


Law Society: professionalising unqualified staff

The Law Society will launch a paralegal accreditation scheme later this year for non-qualified staff working in organisations regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority, it has emerged.

It will be available to the many thousands of staff in legal practice from secretaries to those with an LLB or LLB/LPC and no training contract. The society’s council will be told this week that “the aim is to drive up standards and provide recognition to these employees”.

A report to the council said it is being done within the context of the government-led plan to “professionalise” this sector of the legal workforce. The government-backed national apprenticeship scheme for the legal sector was launched in March and will provide for 750 legal apprenticeships in 2014.

The accreditation scheme is separate from the national apprenticeship programme but will incorporate the three core generic skills identified in its national occupational standards: research, drafting, and ethical and regulatory knowledge.

It is proposed that assessment will be by recognition of educational attainment levels mapped to the national recognised qualifications framework. This will be supplemented by evidence of competence in the core competencies. The report said a survey highlighted the need for training related to the core skills.

In addition it is envisaged that compulsory online training will be required on the ethical and regulatory issues.

The first phase of research into the scheme has found support from firms and employees, and the Law Society will supplement this with focus groups in London and the regions.

The business case for the scheme is set to be submitted to the society’s membership board in June.

The Law Society will be competing with the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives, which is long established as the primary provider of education for paralegals and provides a range of qualifications that can also form the basis of qualification as a chartered legal executive.

The society is also behind its counterpart in Scotland, which in 2010 launched the ‘registered paralegal scheme’ in association with the Scottish Paralegal Association, introducing across-the-board competencies and adherence to a code of conduct for paralegals working with solicitors.

Tags:




    Readers Comments

  • No to PCT says:

    With this will come the dumbing down of the profession and PCT will flourish.

  • Antony says:

    I disagree with the comment. There are more paralegals now than practicing solicitors! Many solicitor’s offices survive by farming out their work to paralegals in-house and externally, but continue to charge the client the rip-off high street rates for the work. Regulation is good as long as its not too severe or restrictive. There’s no ‘dumbing down’ as claimed. As long as you have studied your LLB and don’t forget all those thousands who have completed SPC and the bar course, but simply can’t get places in chambers or jobs after training contracts. A huge proportion of those people are working as paralegals so as not to waste skills, enjoying it and earning more money than they would normally. After all, its better than stacking shelves at Sainsbury!


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


The rise of the agent

We believe AI agents are going to represent the biggest change to the way in which the general public interact with professional services business for generations.


The lonely role of a COFA: sharing the burden of risk management

Compliance officers for finance and administration in law firms can often find themselves walking a solitary path. But what if we could create a collaborative culture of shared accountability?


Mind the (justice) gap: Why are RTAs going up but claims still down?

The gap between the number of road traffic accident injuries and the number of motor injury claims continues to widen, according to the latest government data.


Loading animation