Law firms “cheating” clients out of interest on their money


Edwards: Triple-whammy loss for clients

Law firms are could have made as much as £1.3bn in interest on client money in 2022/23, it has been claimed amid scrutiny of what they pass on to clients.

“Bereaved families are among thousands of people being cheated out of interest on their own money by solicitors”, according to a study by personal finance website Finder.

It found that some firms kept the first £250 of interest, and others paid a “miserly” 0.3% to clients.

Finder cited the Law Society’s 2024 financial benchmarking survey, which revealed that total net interest income across 147 firms, more than two-thirds of which had turnovers of under £10m, rose from £2.6m in 2022 to £27.5m in 2023.

It extrapolated this to suggest that the 7,000 firms that handle client money could have made as much as £1.3bn in interest during the period surveyed (the year to 31 March 2023). “This is a rough estimate because the survey was biassed towards firms with a high turnover,” it cautioned.

As the Bank of England base rate rose to 5% in June 2023, “figures in the survey that reports next year could be even higher”, Finder speculated.

In response to the survey, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) was moved in April to remind law firms of the approach they should take to client interest. The basic rule is that firms must account to clients for a “fair sum of interest”, but ‘fair’ is not defined.

The SRA said it had been told that some firms were not accounting to their clients “for anything like the same rate of interest [as they get], and certainly not what could reasonably be classed as ‘fair’”.

However, an SRA spokesman told Finder it had not received complaints about the issue.

Finder said it checked interest offered on client accounts suitable for solicitors earlier this month and found rates between 1.66% and 1.96% AER (annual equivalent rate) for those depositing £1m or more at big banks.

But Buckinghamshire Building Society was paying 2.7% AER (variable) and “an industry insider told us that it was possible for firms to get around 4.8% – even after the August base rate drop – but banks rarely advertised such deals”.

Finder also looked at the interest policies of six regional and national law firms. One said it would keep all interest unless it topped £250, another that it would pay clients interest at “up to 0.3%”, with nothing paid unless the total amount topped £100, and a third stated it would always pay 0.5% less than it received from the bank.

The other three cited a rate of 1% or “up to 1%”, and none of the six passed on any interest earned below £50.

Finder said it asked the Law Society if firms paying interest to clients of less than 1% while they were receiving well above that figure should increase what they pass on to clients. “A spokesperson replied that firms should comply with the SRA’s rules.”

Finder noted that, as revealed by Legal Futures, the Ministry of Justice is exploring how firms are using interest from client accounts and whether it could be diverted to support free legal advice.

Liz Edwards, a money expert at Finder, said: “Looking through solicitors’ policies was an eye-opener. How can any firm simply decide to pocket £250 of someone else’s money and claim that’s fair?

“For clients, it’s a triple-whammy loss when solicitors have their cash for a long time: they don’t have the use of the money; each day the money is worth less – especially when there’s high inflation – and they lose decent interest they would have got if they’d been able to put it in a savings account while rates are as high as they currently are.

“I know a family who had their probate granted last September and then raised the issue of interest with their solicitor, who had had many thousands of pounds of the family’s money in their client account for at least a year and a half.

“The solicitor seemed surprised and said the point had not been raised – it was quite clear he’d had no intention of paying interest on the money.”

The website provided users with guidance on how to complain if they thought their solicitors have not given them a fair rate of interest.

The question of whether solicitors should continue to hold client money is being looked at as part of the SRA’s consumer protection review.

Speaking on a Legal Futures webinar in May, SRA chief executive Paul Philip said the cost of regulation would “drop like a stone” if solicitors were not allowed to hold client money.




    Readers Comments

  • Gerald Shubumpkin says:

    The writer of this article needs to do a little more to try and understand the legal accounts rules. A solicitor’s client account must be readily available to draw on – so must be treated akin to an instant access account. It must not be used as a bank account for ‘banking only’ purposes – so the interest rate payable to a client cannot exceed rates for instant access at their own bank – otherwise clients would deposit as much as they could with solicitors for a better rate of return. Essentially, it’s a damned if you do, damned if you don’t situation.

  • Gally Maxwell says:

    Mr Shubumkin’s response is a classic narrowing. The content of the SRA Accounts Rules is not relevant to the principles in play: they can always be changed. Client money is held on trust and interest on it belongs to the trust.

    Solicitors have a remarkable sense of entitlement to this money, but the House of Lords caused consternation by … sticking to the law, in Brown v IRC. Pleading that it was impracticable to expect law firms to have to calcluate interest with complications terrifying to lawyers such compound interest, small sums held and indeed varying sums held at different times, Parliament was persuaded to make special provision for poor oppressed solicitors. For those who criticise the Law Society, which has managed to keep this going for 50 years plus, bear in mind that the article tells us that firms have earned over £1 Billion in 2022 alone in this way. In fact it is indefensible in principle and time it was reversed now that computers can calculate sums due automatically.

    I imagine the rate is stated in those Terms and Conditions of which Tom Waits sang: “the large print and the small print taketh away.” Perhaps a public campaign and legislation requiring refund for the last 50 years?

  • Sue Barrott says:

    Do you consider 0.75% on £850,000 held for over 4 months on an instant client account to be fair by the rules of the SRA?


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Five key issues to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech

As generative AI starts to play a bigger role in our working lives, there are some key issues that your law firm needs to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech.


Bulk litigation – not always working in consumers interests

For consumers to get the benefit, bulk litigation needs to be done well, and we are increasingly concerned that there are significant problems in some areas of this market.


ABSs, cost and audits – fixing regulation after Axiom Ince

A feature of law firm collapses and frauds has sometimes been the over-concentration of power in outdated and overburdened systems of control.


Loading animation