Law firm rebuked for not distributing estate after merger


SRA: Delay was unacceptable

A Surrey law firm that failed to deal with an estate it took on after merging with another practice has been rebuked by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).

The errors of Morr & Co kept beneficiaries out of their money for more than five years.

The Redhill-based practice became responsible for administering the estate following its merger with Cozens Moxon & Harts in May 2013. Cozens was holding around £50,000 of funds that were owed to the beneficiaries.

An SRA notice said that, over the next five and a half years, staff at Morr & Co failed to finalise the estate “in a timely manner”, meaning the money was not paid to the beneficiaries.

For much of that time, it failed properly to notify the executor that the funds had been retained, and why, and also did not keep the executor informed about the costs incurred.

Morr & Co admitted the various breaches and that this represented a failure both to provide a proper standard of service and to act in the best interests of each client.

In mitigation, the firm pointed out that it had no regulatory history of similar breaches and had taken remedial action to distribute the funds, with interest. It said it has put improved processes and controls in place to reduce the likelihood of similar breaches in future.

The SRA said this indicated there was a low risk of repetition and that a rebuke was appropriate, given that the clients “have not suffered significant or lasting harm”.

At the same time, “the delay experienced by the beneficiaries was far longer than can be considered acceptable”, meaning “some public sanction” was required to uphold public confidence.

Morr & Co also paid the SRA costs of £300.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Five common myths about claims management

Posted by Daniel Brito, managing director of Legal Futures Associate National Claims The claims management sector has long been misunderstood, with misconceptions persisting about the role we play in the legal process. While solicitors and law firms are rightly focused on compliance and… Read More


Does the Arbitration Act 2025 achieve its aim?

A key objective of the Arbitration Act 2025 is to increase the efficiency of the process, ensuring the UK is well placed to continue competing in the global dispute resolution market.


AI and data-driven approaches to content marketing for law firms

The legal sector is experiencing a rapid technological shift, with artificial intelligence transforming not just legal practice but also how firms market their services.


Loading animation
loading