Ince Group values brand at £17m as turnover soars


Biles: Ince brand is sticky

Listed law firm Ince Group has had its brand valued at £17m, it announced yesterday as it unveiled turnover up 87% to £98.5m, reflecting the full impact of the acquisition of Ince & Co.

What was then Gordon Dadds Group plc bought the City shipping firm at the end of 2018 and the turnover of the renamed group is now nearly four times that of when Gordon Dadds listed three years ago – although it missed its target of hitting £100m in the year to 31 March.

Underlying organic growth was a more modest 5%. Operating profit rose 72% to £26m, with adjusted profit before tax up 36% to £8m.

Some £56m of the turnover came from shipping work, with dispute resolution (£17m, up from £10m) and corporate & tax (£11.6m, down from £13.4m) the other main practice areas.

Turnover also fell in real estate and family & private client, the two other areas for which turnover figures were provided.

With the UK operation generating £64m, Greater China (£19.6m) was the dominant overseas operation, with Dubai next on £4.9m.

Ince now has 734 staff, including 342 fee-earners, compared to 396 staff and 194 fee-earners a year earlier.

Earnings per share dropped 22% to 14.9p following a share issue in February that raised £14m. Ince paid a dividend of 4p in the year and had declared a further dividend of 2p for April, but cancelled this as the Covid-19 pandemic struck.

As a result, it had £6.4m in the bank on 30 July, compared with £5.2m at 31 March, and the firm had reduced indebtedness by £1.3m by scheduled repayments.

Chairman David Furst said: “Various governmental programmes which have been helpful to the group will expire or be reduced over the next few months and there will be obligations to pay back some of this funding.

“Accordingly, the board does not believe it prudent to propose a dividend at this time.”

The group said the first quarter of the current financial year was down 10% on budget. Its Greater China have reopened and are performing “ahead of our expectations”.

“The EMEA and UK offices started re-opening later and are showing encouraging signs of a return to normality.”

Chief executive Adrian Biles told investors that, in the light of “increasing evidence” of the strength of the Ince brand, it had adjusted the balance sheet to ascribe a third-party valuation of £17m to it.

“We recognise that the business is ‘sticky’ to individual partners but is stickier to the Ince brand where clients have multiple touchpoints,” he said.

Finance chief Simon Oakes added: “We have also received initial guidance that the efforts we have invested in developing the brand have significantly increased this value since acquisition.”

The stock exchange announced also recounted how, now that it owned a copy of the basic source code for the group’s practice management system, it has been developed to deal with all London transactions regardless of origin of the transaction or execution or currency.

It will then be installed in all overseas offices over coming months, “becoming one of, if not the only, independent multi-office, multi-currency practice management systems available to UK based businesses which is not associated with a major data supplier and therefore subject to that supplier’s own commercial imperatives. We believe that this is a significant competitive advantage”.

Mr Biles said: “Throughout the year we have recruited exceptionally high-quality partners in the marine, aviation, energy and insurance sectors, expanded the overseas offices and moved into exciting high-growth sectors.

“Also we have welcomed Rampart Corporate Advisors Ltd together with a team of senior shipping colleagues from Bentleys, Stokes and Lowless to the Group.

“We are continuing to realise the full potential of the Ince brand and our first-class people.”

The Ince share price has been on a downward trend since the 2018 deal. It began 2019 on 172.5p but finished it a third lower on 115.8p, and then collapsed to 46.5p following the share issue. Having suffered like the rest of the market in March because of Covid-19, the shares closed yesterday down 6% at 27p.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


The SRA – an unprecedented crisis of confidence

Be in no doubt that yesterday marked the deepest crisis that the Solicitors Regulation Authority has ever faced. It needs to show humility and accountability.


Ten questions to ask a potential financial planning partner

The Solicitors Regulation Authority’s codes of conduct are clear how crucial proper due diligence is when assessing third-party partners.


Seasonal law firm marketing: is it worth it?

Marketing is essential for any law firm looking to attract clients and build its brand. One such strategy that has gained traction in recent years is seasonal marketing.


Loading animation