Exclusive: Lawfront eyes £150m group as ambitions grow


Lloyd: Investing in local brands

Private equity-backed Lawfront – which earlier this month made its fourth major acquisition – is now looking to build a group turning over £150m, Legal Futures can reveal.

The success of the venture to date has prompted its funder, Blixt Group, to raise the ambitions of the group, which was initially to create a business worth £100m.

The deal for Manchester-headquartered Slater Heelis followed Essex practice Fisher Jones Greenwood – the first acquisition in August 2021 – Farleys in Lancashire and East Midland firm Nelsons as the major planks of Lawfront’s group.

Lawfront has also backed two small tuck-in acquisitions for Nelsons and one each for Fisher Jones and Farleys.

Neil Lloyd, chief executive of Lawfront, told Legal Futures that the group was already up to a turnover of £70m, having also recorded growth of 5.6% last year. At Blixt’s instigation, “the ambition has got bigger – now our eyes are on a £150m turnover and getting into the top 40 UK firms”.

The strategy is to buy another three or four ‘regional leaders’ over the next couple of years and then invest in their growth – the West Midlands, South, South-West and North-East are the areas to fill. He is also interested in moving into Wales.

Under the model, the firms are general legal practices that retain their brands but Lawfront has central operations servicing all of them.

The long-term aim is to have 60% of turnover coming from consumer legal services and 40% from advice to SMEs; no one practice area will account for more than 20% of turnover.

Mr Lloyd said “the acceptance [in the acquisition market] of what we’re doing has been quicker than I anticipated”.

He reported three “consistent themes” in his conversations with potential targets: succession, legacy and preservation of brand, and “fear of the ongoing investment cost to remain competitive, particularly in the face of replacing core systems and investment in AI”.

Firms were approaching Lawfront because it was committed to preserving local brands and investing in their management teams, and had the capital to finance their growth plans, he said.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Time to get real: Why authenticity should be at the heart of your marketing

Authenticity is becoming an increasingly important part of marketing. Glossy adverts are no longer enough; these days consumers want to connect with brands on a more personal level.


Why it’s time to embrace health justice partnerships

In July, I completed a second-year evaluation of a health justice project in Australia amid the continuing interest in England and Wales in co-locating health and legal services.


What does the SRA’s consumer protection review mean for law firms?

Practitioners need to be aware of the SRA’s increasing oversight of firms, especially those considering mergers, acquisitions, or private equity investment activity.


Loading animation