Ex-PI firm set to leave nearly £40m of debts unpaid


Debts: Unsecured creditors to receive pennies

The outlook for creditors of failed personal injury firm Roberts Jackson has worsened, with nearly £40m that it owes, more than half to its private equity backer, unlikely to be paid.

The industrial disease specialist was sold to Manchester firm AWH Legal in a pre-pack in September 2018 and it later emerged that a dispute with its former after-the-event insurer was the key factor in the firm becoming insolvent.

The book value of the work in progress bought by AWH was £13.4m, plus debtors, disbursements and accrued revenue totalling just over £6m.

AWH is paying 10% of all profit costs and success fees from settled cases, 50% of the recoverable value of disbursements, 90% of debtors and 60% of accrued income.

The latest update from the joint administrators at Quantuma said they have so far recovered nearly £1.2m and in the best-case scenario this would eventually reach £3.5m.

Roberts Jackson had a £4.25m revolving credit facility with NatWest, secured by way of a debenture incorporating fixed and floating charges. Quantuma estimated that, at best, the bank would recover 56% of this, and at worst 42%, lower figures than earlier on in the administration.

However, the private equity firm NorthEdge Capital, which initially invested £15m in 2014, will not receive any of the £22.5m it is owed, in line with Quantuma’s earlier forecast.

Unsecured creditors – who by law are entitled to a proportion of the proceeds where there is a creditor with a floating charge – were estimated at £13.7m, including £6m to medico-legal agencies. Counsel and other legal advisers were owed £2.4m.

Quantuma has so far received 109 claims from unsecured creditors worth £7.5m, and anticipated the dividend would be in the range of 3.2-4.2p in the pound.

It submitted a confidential report to the Insolvency Service last year following its statutory investigation into the conduct of Roberts Jacksons’ directors.

Quantuma is being paid £45,000 plus 3.5% of the value of the total assets realised.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Five key issues to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech

As generative AI starts to play a bigger role in our working lives, there are some key issues that your law firm needs to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech.


Bulk litigation – not always working in consumers interests

For consumers to get the benefit, bulk litigation needs to be done well, and we are increasingly concerned that there are significant problems in some areas of this market.


ABSs, cost and audits – fixing regulation after Axiom Ince

A feature of law firm collapses and frauds has sometimes been the over-concentration of power in outdated and overburdened systems of control.


Loading animation