Complaining to the SRA? Don’t expect a quick reply


SRA: Increase has not reduced or stabilised

Members of the public and firms reporting concerns to the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) will have to wait up to two months for a response, twice the time it was at the start of the year.

The regulator has blamed a major uptick in reports it receives about solicitors for what it said would only be a “temporary” change.

Complainants are being told that can expect to wait 50 to 55 working days for a response in non-urgent matters, having been 25 to 30 working days until recently.

The problem was foreshadowed in papers before January’s meeting of the SRA board, which noted a “downward trend” in the assessment and early resolution (AERT) of cases, following a recent significant increase in volumes.

From September to November 2024, “we received over 800 more new reports than forecast, based on the previous year’s receipts for those months. We forecast 2,835 and received 3,643, 29% more than forecast.

“This is impacting on the number of unallocated cases and closure performance. Several measures have been taken to seek to address this challenge, and the AERT team closed 1,069 reports in November 2024, the second highest level since January 2023.”

An SRA spokesman said it was carrying out an analysis to identify any trends behind the rise.

“The increase has not reduced or stabilised, so to manage expectations among those that make reports, we have extended temporarily the time needed to get back to non-urgent queries.

“We have also put in place measures to manage this increase, including additional temporary resource and longer-term improvements to speed up decision making.”

The news follows concerted work the SRA has been doing to reduce the number of live investigations older than two years.

As of July 2023, there were 162 cases that had been open for more than two years (it had been over 200 the year before) and the target was to halve that over the 12 months – in fact, there were 60 open cases by 30 June 2024, a 63% reduction, although later statistics showed that it remained at that level into autumn.

Separately, the SRA’s executive director for strategy and innovation, Aileen Armstrong, revealed last week that the number of investigations into law firms in relation to their conduct of volume litigation has risen from over 50 before Christmas to over 60.




    Readers Comments

  • Colin Smith says:

    The SRA are directing all resources at AML etc and anything they can fine firms for to raise revenue.

  • Shaz says:

    Solicitors are getting abused on a unprecedented scale, every time someone does not agree with a solicitor they complain , it is undermining their authority and ability to practice. It is abusive, non clients should not be allowed to complain full stop. And only serious allegations relating to their conduct in business or professional scenarios should be taken up, the sra needs to deregulate this as it is abusive, you let the entire public abuse solicitors, this is not on , and must be stopped.


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Why better domestic abuse screening in mediation is long overdue

If there’s one thing the legal profession could do today, it would be to make domestic abuse and safeguarding training mandatory for all family lawyers and mediators.


AI in personal injury – the future

The traditional lawyer in me – and one who increasingly finds technology more confusing with each passing day – is resistant but it doesn’t take a lot to surmise that AI will likely become a very important tool.


Ten top tips for turning transparency into positivity and new clients

New SRA guidance on transparency issued last autumn – thinly disguised as continued support for COLPs, firms and individuals – was without doubt also borne out of regulatory frustration.


Loading animation
loading