Campaign group calls on lawyers to join push for NDA law reform


Perkins: Government dragging its feet

A campaign group has urged the legal profession to support legislative reform to stop the abuse of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs).

While welcoming last week’s Legal Services Board report summarising the evidence it has received on NDA misuse, Can’t Buy My Silence (CBMS) said “victims need action, not more reviews”.

Co-founder Zelda Perkins said: “This is yet another official report that details the devastating impacts abusive NDAs have on people’s lives and the gap in lawyers’ knowledge on how to negotiate these agreements appropriately.

“The evidence clearly confirms our data and we welcome that the LSB undertook this research and has made these findings public.

“There can no longer be any question of the issues at stake and we continue to urge both the legal sector and the government to make decisive reforms. To add to this, the most recent exposé of the Post Office using NDAs so harmfully surely makes action to ban abusive NDAs the only way forward.”

Ms Perkins is the woman who first broke a Harvey Weinstein NDA, and she co-founded CBMS with Dr Julie Macfarlane.

CMBS is calling on the government to expand the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act 2023 – which outlaws NDAs in cases of harassment, sexism, bullying and discrimination – to the entire economic workforce.

She observed that next month marked five years since then Prime Minister Theresa May spoke out against “the unethical misuse of NDAs” and vowed to change the law around them.

“Since May uttered those words, Britain has had three prime ministers, eight justice secretaries, and countless reviews by legal bodies into abusive NDAs have been carried out.

“All have concluded the same thing: abusive NDAs have a destructive effect on the health and wellbeing of those made to sign them and stop victims of miscarriages of justice from coming forward.

“As recently as last month, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak declared that NDAs should not be used in this way and yet the government continues to drag its feet on protecting victims of harm from abusive NDAs.”

Ms Perkins argued that, in face of the “overwhelming” evidence, the legal sector, including the Law Society, Bar Council and Solicitors Regulation Authority, needed to join the call for changes to the law.

“Whilst the government is stalling over protecting victims from abusive NDAs, the legal community has an opportunity to get its own house in order and push for legislative reform,” she said.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Mind the (justice) gap: Why are RTAs going up but claims still down?

The gap between the number of road traffic accident injuries and the number of motor injury claims continues to widen, according to the latest government data.


Five key issues to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech

As generative AI starts to play a bigger role in our working lives, there are some key issues that your law firm needs to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech.


Bulk litigation – not always working in consumers interests

For consumers to get the benefit, bulk litigation needs to be done well, and we are increasingly concerned that there are significant problems in some areas of this market.


Loading animation