BSB pilots reverse race mentoring for senior White barristers


Lindsay: First mentor

The Bar Standards Board (BSB) has launched a pilot reverse mentoring scheme, in which Bar students and junior barristers from Black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) backgrounds mentor senior White barristers.

The BSB said it recognised that the scheme would involve “difficult and potentially uncomfortable conversations”, but to achieve race equality in the profession “the onus of change needs to be on the White majority and senior ranks of the profession”.

Developed by the BSB’s race equality taskforce, the scheme is designed to “address the barriers to race equality at the Bar, by providing insight into people’s experiences of racism”.

Bar students, pupils and junior barristers up of to seven years’ call from BAME backgrounds are the mentors and barristers with seven years or more call from White backgrounds the mentees. Members of the same chambers will not be paired.

They are expected to have regular one-to-one meetings. The BSB said that as a result of the understanding they would gain, mentees would benefit by being able “to design and deliver anti-racist strategies to increase impact within their chambers, other organisations or networks at the Bar and the wider profession”.

The scheme would allowing mentors to become agents of change for, and have a bigger influence on, “better race equality outcomes at the Bar”, while also having “access to strategic thinking of senior members of the Bar”, increasing their profile and enjoying network and contact opportunities.

The first pairing is Paul Stanley QC, based at Essex Court Chambers and a member of the race equality taskforce, and Elisha Lindsay, a Bar student and race equality activist.

Stanley: First mentee

Mr Stanley, a commercial silk since 2010, specialises in financial services, insurance-related and complex civil fraud cases, is a “White ally” – described as a White person with a commitment to non-complacency, who takes proactive steps to confront and dismantle racism and race inequality.

He is equality and diversity officer at his chambers, a pupil supervisor and director of the South Eastern Circuit advanced advocacy course.

“It is a privilege to be able to be involved in this ground-breaking initiative,” he said.

“Being mentored by Elisha gives me a golden opportunity to learn from her experience and insight, and to challenge my own preconceptions and prejudices.

“I know it will make me a better anti-racist ally, and help me to change myself and the profession for the better.”

Ms Lindsay added: “Initiating a programme that brings together the concept of diversity in a tangible and practical way is something I never thought would be achievable.

“Seeing how receptive members of the Bar are to hearing and learning about anti-racist practices and achieving true diversity within the Bar gives me hope for a more inclusive environment”.

The BSB – whose director-general, Mark Neale, has volunteered to be mentored – said it understood that the scheme would involve “difficult and potentially uncomfortable conversations between participants”.

The regulator went on: “When compared to traditional mentoring schemes, reverse mentoring is more likely to ensure mutual benefit to both the mentor and the mentee, and to pair people who might otherwise not come together.

“The scheme reflects our belief that, to achieve race equality in our profession, the onus of change needs to be on the White majority and senior ranks of the profession.”

Amit Popat, head of equality and access to justice at the BSB and chair of the race equality taskforce, added: “This is the first race equality reverse mentoring scheme launched at the Bar.

“It presents a new and innovative approach to promoting inclusion, which we believe will benefit both established and aspiring barristers, while making a meaningful cultural change.”

To apply to take part in the scheme, go to the BSB website.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Five key issues to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech

As generative AI starts to play a bigger role in our working lives, there are some key issues that your law firm needs to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech.


Bulk litigation – not always working in consumers interests

For consumers to get the benefit, bulk litigation needs to be done well, and we are increasingly concerned that there are significant problems in some areas of this market.


ABSs, cost and audits – fixing regulation after Axiom Ince

A feature of law firm collapses and frauds has sometimes been the over-concentration of power in outdated and overburdened systems of control.


Loading animation