Barrister sets up BSB-regulated firm to work for City solicitors


jane walshe

Walshe: “the legal landscape is changing so much”

A barrister has set up a limited company, regulated by the Bar Standards Board (BSB), to work as a consultant for a leading City law firm.

Jane Walshe, a financial services and compliance specialist, said: “I was the first person to be authorised to work in this way, but I won’t be the last.

“If the BSB had rejected my application, I would have become a solicitor. The legal landscape is changing so much. It was about time the Bar caught up, and it has done.”

Since Berwin Leighton Paisner set up Lawyers on Demand in 2007, a number of City firms have followed suit under different brands, describing their lawyers as working freelance or as consultants.

Ms Walshe went on: “I can’t offer regulated services as a barrister and charge people via a limited company, without it becoming an authorised body. I wanted to work for the law firm as a business, and not as an employed barrister. It gives me more flexibility.”

Ms Walshe said all the solicitors working for her firm through flexible contracts operated through limited companies so “they could not later be accused of being an employee” of the firm.

“The firms themselves like people to work as limited companies, and it’s a standard resourcing model.”

Ms Walshe said being a limited company gave her greater control over tax and expenses. She is currently working for the law firm on a financial services project for four days a week, and as a compliance consultant, as director of Compass Compliance, for one day.

“This ensures there are clear divisions over the work I do as a lawyer and as a compliance consultant,” she said. “It keeps things nice and separate.”

The BSB, which predicted at one point last year that it would authorise 400 firms in 2015, approved only 32 in its first four months as an entity regulator, papers for July’s board meeting reported.

Tags:




    Readers Comments

  • Ian Beeby says:

    I am not surprised at the low numbers. My calculations suggest that unless you need to avoid mixing PAYE and self-employed earnings the higher costs of regulation are not offset by any tax advantages until earnings are quite high.


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Five key issues to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech

As generative AI starts to play a bigger role in our working lives, there are some key issues that your law firm needs to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech.


Bulk litigation – not always working in consumers interests

For consumers to get the benefit, bulk litigation needs to be done well, and we are increasingly concerned that there are significant problems in some areas of this market.


ABSs, cost and audits – fixing regulation after Axiom Ince

A feature of law firm collapses and frauds has sometimes been the over-concentration of power in outdated and overburdened systems of control.


Loading animation