Barrister firm to be like solicitors’ practice – “but a better kind of solicitor”


Richard Hendron

Hendron: “time of turmoil” is over

One of the newest barrister entities has said that using its services will be “like going to a solicitor’s firm, but a better kind of solicitor”.

Barrister Richard Hendron of Strand Chambers is to launch Defacto Legal, regulated by the Bar Standards Board (BSB) next month.

Mr Hendron said Defacto Legal would be “barrister-led and barrister-run”, and consist of barristers, each supervising at least two paralegals. He said the aim was to open the firm’s offices in Soho by the end of June.

Mr Hendron, a police officer turned criminal defence specialist, said he wanted to move away from the Inns of Court and Temple to Soho, “where people work and socialise”. He said the firm would initially concentrate on commercial contracts and property work.

“We want to access markets that the Bar is not used to dealing with and create an image that is not necessarily one the Bar would use. Defacto is not a traditional name. It means ‘as a matter of fact’, and that’s the image we’re going for. We’ll be telling it straight – the way it is.

“It will be like going to a solicitor’s firm, but a better kind of solicitor. People have more confidence in barristers.”

Mr Hendron said that while the Bar was “slow to do anything new”, solicitors had actively embraced ABSs. “Entities are definitely the way to go. By having an entity, you can share not only resources and income, but also expertise and ideas.”

Mr Hendron said that when the BSB starts regulating ABSs, Defacto would apply to become one.

He argued that the fact that the vast majority of barristers were self-employed meant that “unless you’re cutting the mustard, you won’t survive”.

He went on: “Barristers have a better reputation than solicitors. If you’re a solicitor and you’re not that great, you can still survive and take your salary home. It’s not just that barristers think they have higher standing – clients perceive it that way as well.”

Mr Hendron has been in the news of late for representing his twin brother, Henry, a high-profile barrister in his own right and founder of Strand Chambers. Henry was given a 140-hour community sentence after pleading guilty at the Old Bailey to supplying drugs that killed his Colombian boyfriend, Miguel Jimenez.

Richard said: “It was a time of turmoil for everybody, but it’s over. I am pleased that this chapter is finished and we can move on.”

Richard was in the media spotlight himself earlier this year when he resigned from UKIP and strongly criticised Alan Craig, one of the party’s London Assembly candidates, for holding homophobic views.

In a separate development, two barristers have set up a BSB-regulated firm to provide clients with a “bespoke service”, principally in sports, entertainment and media law.

Simon Collingham, barrister at 2 Dr Johnson’s Buildings in the Temple, said VII Law would “fit nicely” into the work of the chambers, which was centred on crime and family work, much of which was legally aided.

“The changing legal landscape means that chambers need to broaden their expertise into more commercial work,” he said.

“We will use solicitors if we need to, but why would we want to give work away when we have the potential to build a business? We are hoping to attract high-profile clients who want a five-star service.”

Mr Collingham said he and colleague Rossano Cifonelli had been trained to provide direct access and litigation work. He said VII Law would be based at chambers, where it could share the use of clerks and instruct advocates to represent its clients.

Mr Collingham added that VII had the capability to conduct football transfers as a registered intermediary, authorised by the FA, and would be developing this work “through our own personal contacts and structured marketing”.

Tags:




    Readers Comments

  • Jonathan Maskew says:

    The opportunity for barristers to provide their services directly has never been better.
    Whilst there are always challenges the emerging need of fixed fee legal advice is creating huge opportunity for the team at ShenSmith barristers where cost predicability and service remain key and integrity assumed of course.

  • Nick says:

    If barristers have a better standing among the public than solicitors, maybe Mr Hendron could explain why when people search for legal advice on Google they overwhelmingly type “solicitor” and not “barrister” into their computer? I’d suggest they’re not doing that because they think barristers will provide a better service. I suspect he knows this, which is why he keeps saying “solicitor” as it will boost his search rankings.

    Good luck to him though. I gave up on the Bar many years ago to re-qualify as a solicitor. I have always found both branches of the profession slow and antiquated, the Bar more so but neither branch is exactly dynamic. It’s good to see forward thinking barristers looking to the future.

    I hope that things like this will eventually lead to a fused profession fit for the 21st century and beyond – that will be better for clients and the professions.

  • Anon (AnonAnonAnon!) says:

    So to be clear this chap is a criminal defence specialist but intends to open a firm dealing solely in commercial and property work…

    Fine, so long as the firm’s PII provides sufficient cover!

  • sarah Mc says:

    if the barrister or solicitor would like to end the client case can the client be given 30 days or any just end now without any notice? I need an answer…

  • Sara says:

    The Barrister is much .. much better in giving the advice. It used to be that we have to go to Solicitors for advice and that the solicitors consult the Barrister since 2004 the Barrister was allowed to deal directly with the public and the Public started to save much more monies, as they used to pay double first to Solicitor and then to a Barrister.


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Five key issues to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech

As generative AI starts to play a bigger role in our working lives, there are some key issues that your law firm needs to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech.


Bulk litigation – not always working in consumers interests

For consumers to get the benefit, bulk litigation needs to be done well, and we are increasingly concerned that there are significant problems in some areas of this market.


ABSs, cost and audits – fixing regulation after Axiom Ince

A feature of law firm collapses and frauds has sometimes been the over-concentration of power in outdated and overburdened systems of control.


Loading animation