Barrass to leave SRA


Barrass: five years at SRA

Samantha Barrass, who has led the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s (SRA) work on licensing alternative business structures, is leaving to become chief executive of the Gibraltar Financial Services Commission.

Ms Barrass will join the commission on 17 February 2014. Currently executive director of supervision, authorisation, and intelligence and investigation, she joined the SRA in 2009 after a career in the UK financial services sector, including a period in senior roles at the Financial Services Authority.

She was one of the first economists employed by the FSA to develop cost-benefit and other evidential techniques for new regulation.

She began her working career at the Reserve Bank of New Zealand as an economist focused on monetary policy strategy and economic reform.

SRA chief executive Antony Townsend, who himself is leaving the organisation, said: “I am particularly grateful to Samantha for her leadership in implementing outcomes-focused regulation and the framework for our licensing of ABSs. In addition, the development of our risk-based approach to regulation has been constant throughout her career here; first in her work with the risk centre and now through her leadership of the R-View change programme. I wish her every success in her new role.”

Commission chairman Alan Whiting said: “With Samantha’s proven high calibre and international experience in financial and legal regulation, I am confident that Gibraltar can look forward to continued growth as a successful, prospering and well regulated financial services sector with a high international reputation.”

Ms Barrass said: “The commission rightly enjoys a strong reputation for delivering high-quality regulation of Gibraltar’s growing and prosperous financial services sector. I am very much looking forward to leading the organisation, working closely with stakeholders, to build on those excellent foundations, further develop Gibraltar’s financial services markets and enhance its reputation for excellent regulation of those markets.”

Tags:




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Five key issues to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech

As generative AI starts to play a bigger role in our working lives, there are some key issues that your law firm needs to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech.


Bulk litigation – not always working in consumers interests

For consumers to get the benefit, bulk litigation needs to be done well, and we are increasingly concerned that there are significant problems in some areas of this market.


ABSs, cost and audits – fixing regulation after Axiom Ince

A feature of law firm collapses and frauds has sometimes been the over-concentration of power in outdated and overburdened systems of control.


Loading animation