Ban for PI fee-earner who used Covid as excuse for missing deadlines


Slater & Gordon: Fee-earner tried to blame scanning

A fee-earner at Slater & Gordon who falsely claimed he had missed litigation deadlines because of scanning errors and not being in the office due to the pandemic has been banned from working in law firms.

Michael Berry worked as a legal advisor in the personal injury department at Slater & Gordon in Manchester for a year to October 2020.

A notice published by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) said that, on 6 July 2020, he filed with the court and served on the defendant, an application for relief from sanctions and an extension of time to serve a claim form, particulars of claim, medical evidence and schedule of special damages. The extended date for service was 20 June 2020.

They were supported by his witness statement, which “falsely and/or misleadingly purported to evidence” that he was not aware that the court had made an order on the extended service a year earlier because it had not been scanned onto the firm’s case management system.

He further claimed that, due to the Covid restrictions, he was not able to review the paper file in the office and so the order was first discovered on 6 July 2020 during an audit. He said counsel had then been instructed to settle the particulars of claim urgently.

The following month, Mr Berry did the same on another matter.

The SRA said he breached multiple principles, including acting with honesty and integrity.

As Slater & Gordon is an alternative business structure, Mr Berry was made subject to a disqualification order under section 99 of the Legal Services Act 2007, which prevents him from working in a licensed body.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


The future of holding client money

Posted by Robert Blech, a professional practices partner at Legal Futures Associate MHA In the fallout from Axiom Ince and other high-profile law firm failures, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) began talking about the possibility of introducing an alternative system… Read More


Why the RTA claims process is still flawed and how to fix it

Almost four years and more than a million claims on from the launch of the Official Injury Claim portal, the system designed to simplify the process is still beset with problems.


The CJC’s challenge – getting the litigation funding balance right

Anything beyond minimal regulation would be challenging to structure and enforce, and practitioners do not see it as viable to rely on the courts as a fallback.


Loading animation
loading