Alternative legal services provider enters recruitment market


Hayter: Quicker than recruitment agencies

Global alternative legal services provider (ALSP) Axiom has entered the UK in-house legal recruitment market, both for permanent staff and for ‘interim to permanent’ positions.

Daniel Hayter, vice-president and managing director of Axiom London, described the legal recruitment market as a “little bit broken”, and said Axiom was launching its new service not to be the cheapest but because it “had the ability to recruit the best”.

Mr Hayter said the nature and scope of the work of in-house legal departments had become more complex and clients had asked for the new service, just as some of its lawyers were interested in finding a permanent role.

“It’s about choice for clients and legal professionals. The recruitment process as it currently stands is a little bit broken.

“Do HR professionals understand the legal world? It’s very difficult to understand and recruit into. That’s where we come in.”

He went on: “It’s not about being cheapest or most expensive but about finding specialist talent for in-house roles.”

Mr Hayter said Axiom would only be recruiting in the legal sector: “What is missing at the moment is having the experience in place to identify the right people to hire and do it quickly.”

Axiom said it could find current clients direct permanent placements in “just a few days or weeks – instead of the months it takes traditional executive search firms and HR teams”.

Meanwhile, fee-share law firm Temple Bright has launched a new flexible resourcing offering called Source for clients.

Co-founder Tim Summers said he believed Temple Bright was the first “new model” law firm to make the move.

He said Temple Bright, based in London and Bristol, was “deliberately very selective” about who it took on. “We feel that we can apply the same rigour to the selection of flexible lawyers to the panel and the same rigorous standards.”

Peter Workman, chief executive of Source, ran flexible resourcing businesses for both PwC and KPMG as a partner in their legal divisions.

He would not give numbers of lawyers that Source was aiming to recruit to its panel, but said “the focus was on quality” and “we are ambitious and looking to grow a large offering”.

Mr Workman said that in his previous roles he would speak to clients who thought they needed a permanent role for three to six months, while in fact they needed someone to work flexibly for 10 hours a month.

He said that clients tended to be larger in-house legal teams, but there was a growing demand for a “fractional GC or in-house counsel model”, where they worked on a part-time basis.

Mr Summers said Temple Bright was “distinctive in the market”, with its senior lawyers “much more affordable” than City law firms.

The improving economy meant that “deals were up”, but the demand for flexible legal support was “growing anyway”.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Mind the (justice) gap: Why are RTAs going up but claims still down?

The gap between the number of road traffic accident injuries and the number of motor injury claims continues to widen, according to the latest government data.


Five key issues to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech

As generative AI starts to play a bigger role in our working lives, there are some key issues that your law firm needs to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech.


Bulk litigation – not always working in consumers interests

For consumers to get the benefit, bulk litigation needs to be done well, and we are increasingly concerned that there are significant problems in some areas of this market.


Loading animation