Accounts manager tried to remove partners from roll of solicitors


SRA: Section 43 orders

An accounts manager who tried to remove her firm’s partners from the roll of solicitors has been barred from working for law firms.

Syriah Gordon-Jones can only in future work for practices overseen by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) with its permission, under the terms of a so-called section 43 order.

A notice published last week said that Ms Gordon-Jones worked as an accounts manager for Camberley, Surrey firm Neale Turk Ruchfort between 13 May and 20 October 2020.

It was found that, on or around 20 October, she accessed the partners’ mySRA accounts and made amendments to their records, as well as an application for removal from the roll of solicitors, without their permission.

She also contacted the firm’s accountants and directed them to prepare a payslip for her salary and notice pay of £5,000, when this was not authorised or agreed by the firm.

Further, she made “racist and abusive comments” towards the partners, including threats of harm.

The SRA said the conduct had “the potential to cause significant harm to the partners at the firm” and made it “undesirable for her to be involved in a legal practice”.

The SRA has also imposed a section 43 order on David Hawkins, who used to be a bookkeeper at DW Solicitors in Northampton.

He admitted failing to adjust his monthly salary to reflect the salary advancements he had received, which resulted in nine months of double salary. This was dishonest, the SRA said.

In addition, he admitted posting the incorrect monies received to the different client ledgers, which led to a shortfall in client account and the firm being in breach of the accounts rules. “It is therefore not desirable for a bookkeeper who acts in this way to be involved in legal practice.”

Both Ms Gordon-Jones and Mr Hawkins were ordered to pay SRA costs of £600.

Section 43 of the Solicitors Act 1974 allows the SRA to control the employment of non-solicitors in the profession.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Mind the (justice) gap: Why are RTAs going up but claims still down?

The gap between the number of road traffic accident injuries and the number of motor injury claims continues to widen, according to the latest government data.


Five key issues to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech

As generative AI starts to play a bigger role in our working lives, there are some key issues that your law firm needs to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech.


Bulk litigation – not always working in consumers interests

For consumers to get the benefit, bulk litigation needs to be done well, and we are increasingly concerned that there are significant problems in some areas of this market.


Loading animation