Barristers who work for free could be breaching referral fee ban, Bar Council warns


police station

Bar Council: law firms “wrong to suggest no fee is available”

Criminal barristers who agree to work for law firms “for no fee” could be breaching the referral fee ban, the Bar Council has warned.

The Bar Council said that in cases where no representation orders had been granted and counsel was “unassigned”, some solicitors were asking barristers “to conduct such hearings in the magistrates’ courts for no fee”.

In return, the solicitors had “stated that instructions to conduct the consequent Crown Court trials will, in the absence of unforeseen circumstances, be sent to members of chambers (who may or may not be counsel who conducted the magistrates’ court hearing)”.

In a guidance note issued by its ethics committee and posted on its website this week, the Bar Council said that in these cases law firms were “wrong to suggest that no fee is available for this work”.

The Legal Aid Agency had confirmed that the fee for barristers was included in the payment made to solicitors under the Litigators’ Graduated Fee Scheme, the Bar Council said, and barristers were entitled to be remunerated out of these payments.

Referring to earlier guidance by its ethics committee on referral fees, the Bar Council said the committee’s views was that “acceptance of an improperly low proportion of the fee paid under a graduated fee scheme can amount to a referral fee”.

The earlier guidance, updated last summer, reminded barristers that referral fees are banned under the Bar Standards Board (BSB) handbook.

The guidance stated that the provision of junior barristers at “discounted fees” or “even for no fee at all”, in return for securing instructions for other members of chambers, particularly more senior members, was prohibited.

“Not only does this involve a disguised referral fee, but it also involves a serious abuse of the most vulnerable in the profession.”

The Bar Council also referred to its protocol for instructing counsel in magistrates’ court cases and a letter from its chairman reminded heads of chambers that requiring junior counsel to work at rates “significantly below” the recommended levels was likely to be a further breach of duty under the BSB handbook.

The Ministry of Justice set out plans in a consultation paper last autumn for a statutory ban on solicitors seeking referral fees from advocates in criminal legal aid cases.

Tags:




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Bulk litigation – not always working in consumers interests

For consumers to get the benefit, bulk litigation needs to be done well, and we are increasingly concerned that there are significant problems in some areas of this market.


ABSs, cost and audits – fixing regulation after Axiom Ince

A feature of law firm collapses and frauds has sometimes been the over-concentration of power in outdated and overburdened systems of control.


The new sexual harassment law: first among equals?

If there is a case for enhancing compensation for sexual harassment cases, then surely there is an equally strong case for enhancing compensation for other forms of harassment?


Loading animation