Want the good life? Go to the commercial and chancery Bar


Walker: Worrying trend

Commercial and chancery practitioners are by far the most satisfied practitioners at the Bar, while those in crime and family the least, new research published today by the Bar Council has reported.

While only 30% of family and 34% of criminal barristers said they were able to balance their home and work lives, the figure was 61% for commercial and chancery. The overall figure was 45%.

Just 18% of criminal barristers thought there were fairly paid considering their expertise (77% for commercial and chancery), and the survey of 4,092 barristers was carried out last summer, before the latest pay showdown.

Less than half of family barristers (46%) considered themselves able to cope with the level of stress in the jobs – the lowest among the practice areas surveyed – while only 12% said they did not feel under too much work pressure.

Again, criminal and family barristers were far more likely than others to feel under pressure from their chambers/employers to take work they would rather not.

Almost all barristers (89%) across all areas of practice agreed that they found their work interesting, and 61% said that most days they were enthusiastic about their work.

In almost all areas surveyed, commercial and chancery barristers came out as the happiest with their lot.

Looked at in comparison with previous surveys in 2011 and 2013, several measures were worse than in the past, but there were improvements in barristers saying there was a fair allocation of work at their chambers (up to 64%) and that they would recommend a career at the bar (up to 48%).

Bar Council chairman Andrew Walker QC: “The fact that many saw their workload, stress and work-life balance deteriorate further is a worrying trend.

“It shows that we must all maintain our efforts across the Bar to support those who are finding practice ever more difficult to sustain, both financially and in terms of maintaining and enjoying a healthy and fulfilling life both at work and at home.

“It shows, too, how important it is for the leadership of the Bar to be making our case to the government, in Parliament and to the public about the long-term consequences of failing to value and pay properly for the delivery of justice in England and Wales.”




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Mind the (justice) gap: Why are RTAs going up but claims still down?

The gap between the number of road traffic accident injuries and the number of motor injury claims continues to widen, according to the latest government data.


Five key issues to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech

As generative AI starts to play a bigger role in our working lives, there are some key issues that your law firm needs to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech.


Bulk litigation – not always working in consumers interests

For consumers to get the benefit, bulk litigation needs to be done well, and we are increasingly concerned that there are significant problems in some areas of this market.


Loading animation