Taylor Rose targets further growth after £5m capital injection


Jaggard: Growth by acquisition remains key

Fast-growing consumer law firm Taylor Rose MW is eyeing up further acquisitions and office openings over the coming year after receiving investment totalling nearly £5m.

The money is coming from John McMillan, one of the founders of McMillan Williams (MW) – which Taylor Rose bought out of administration for £1.4m last May – and former MW chief executive Colum Smith.

The pair made an initial investment to support the acquisition and have now taken up an option in the agreement to increase that to nearly £5m.

Taylor Rose has grown rapidly since opening in Peterborough in 2009 – springing out of what was originally a law costs business set up in 1998 – and all of its growth until now has been funded out of retained profits.

But chief executive Adrian Jaggard said the initial investment removed the uncertainly at the time caused by lockdown.

The new funds were aimed at taking the firm to the next level and he said that, although not looking for deals quite of the scale of MW – which doubled the size of Taylor Rose – growth by acquisition remained a key part of the business plan.

He said he was currently talking to four prospects: “The credibility, buying power and efficiency we have make us a very attractive proposition.”

The recently rebranded Taylor Rose MW is now a £60m business with 900 people working out of 32 offices around the country, although the integration process led to 50 redundancies across both firms.

Around half of the combined practice is dedicated to property work, with the rest a wide range of consumer law matters, while Taylor Rose MW is also looking to expand its offering to SMEs.

Some 350 lawyers and support staff operate through the firm’s consultancy proposition, who both source their own work but also receive referrals from Taylor Rose MW and “play a significant role in helping the firm flex the resourcing it needs for different projects”, said Mr Jaggard.

The firm targets up to 50% of its revenue to be supplied by self-employed consultants, although the size of the MW acquisition meant it was currently weighted more on the employed side.

The consultancy arm is on track to turn over around £20m this year and Mr Jaggard said it was on “an accelerated recruitment drive” to redress the balance, adding that the new locations also gave consultants more places to work from if they needed office space.

Mr Jaggard said the ultimate goal was to make Taylor Rose MW an even bigger player in the consumer law market – it is already the fifth largest conveyancing firm in the country.

He said that what drew him to MW was the “underlying quality” of the lawyers and clients.

“I think people sometimes overlooked that. They are very well integrated in lots of communities holding strong goodwill and high-quality contracts in those communities – that has a lot of value attached to it.

“Our strategy until now has been focused on national contracts. I believe the combination of these two approaches, along with our consultancy operation, makes for a powerful combination able to serve consumer clients on every level.”

Mr Jaggard acknowledged that events in recent years – such as the high-profile disciplinary case involving junior solicitor Sovani James – have raised questions about the culture at MW.

He said: “There were issues at MW involving many different parties, which explains in part why it ended in administration. But Taylor Rose MW is very different and we are now running the business and managing the staff in line with our culture and moral compass.”

Mr McMillan said: “Adrian and his team have built a great business that has grown at a phenomenal rate over several years.

“The combination with McMillan Williams offered our staff a fresh start and created a unique three-tiered offering in the market of local, national and consultants-based services that we believe will feed off each to make the whole even greater than the sum of its parts.”

Mr Smith added: “Taylor Rose MW is a forward-thinking firm that understands the demands of the modern legal market from both the clients and lawyers prospective.

“Its combination with McMillan Williams ensures we are now uniquely positioned to challenge slower-moving incumbents.”




    Readers Comments

  • Raghavendra Mithare says:

    It is good know that it has grown to this scale in a short span. They should not forget the ‘culture’ that has helped them to grow. Growth is easy but sustaining needs a strong culture. Most of the Law firms are very poor in using Tech and Agile processes to manage “customer centricity”.


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Five key issues to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech

As generative AI starts to play a bigger role in our working lives, there are some key issues that your law firm needs to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech.


Bulk litigation – not always working in consumers interests

For consumers to get the benefit, bulk litigation needs to be done well, and we are increasingly concerned that there are significant problems in some areas of this market.


ABSs, cost and audits – fixing regulation after Axiom Ince

A feature of law firm collapses and frauds has sometimes been the over-concentration of power in outdated and overburdened systems of control.


Loading animation