No plans to monitor whether insurers pass on whiplash savings, says government


Osborne: government expects savings to be passed on

Osborne: government expects savings to be passed on

The government will not be monitoring insurance companies to ensure that they pass on to policyholders the savings they make from its planned personal injury reforms, a minister has admitted.

Just after Christmas, the government announced that leading insurers have committed to giving customers 100% of the savings, as Chancellor George Osborne had demanded in the Autumn Statement.

Asked in Parliament by shadow justice minister Andy Slaughter what “mechanism” will be used to ensure this happens, economic secretary to the Treasury Harriett Baldwin replied: “The pricing of insurance products is a commercial matter for individual insurers in which the government does not seek to intervene.

“The motor insurance market is intensely competitive and the government therefore expects that the insurance industry will pass on savings to consumers. Some insurers have already committed to pass on all savings to consumers as a result of the proposed changes.”

The December press release only named Aviva and LV= as making such a pledge.

Announcing the reforms in the Autumn Statement, Mr Osborne said: “This will end the cycle in which responsible motorists pay higher premiums to cover false claims by others. It will remove over £1bn from the cost of providing motor insurance and the government expects the insurance industry to pass an average saving of £40 to £50 per motor insurance policy on to consumers.”

Tom Jones, head of policy at Thompsons, said: “As suspected, the government has no intention of making the insurance industry do anything. The government is happy to intervene in the market to force up the small claims limit if it helps their friends in the insurance industry.

“When it comes to forcing the insurers to pass on the millions of pounds they will save to the consumer paying the premiums, they rely on volunteers. Those who are going to benefit here are the insurers and their shareholders…

“If insurance companies did the right thing by consumers, premiums would already be going down. If insurance companies did the right thing by consumers, their margins would be much tighter and consumers would have already felt the benefit of the competition that the government lays such store by. The fact is they haven’t.”

Mr Jones said that Association of British Insurers reports showed that the cost of claims have reduced 29% in the last five years and yet the average premium rose 9.2% in the 12 months to September 2015, with Direct Line and Admiral have paid out £1.65 billion in dividends over the last three years.

According to the newly released Confused.com car insurance price index, motorists were hit by the highest quarterly increases in five years, with premiums up 7% in the last quarter of 2015 to stand at £672.




    Readers Comments

  • Dan Thompson says:

    That’s funny, is it not a commercial matter as to what solicitors charge for their services? Apparently not. The government think it’s appropriate to tell us what we can charge. This is so messed up that it’s beyond laughable.

  • Malcolm Roberts says:

    Does this government have no shame?

  • John Bower says:

    But the government intends to intervene in in the commerce of the insurance industry by ensuring risks for which the premiums have been set will not be allowed by law to materialise resulting in massive windfall profits for the insurer. Beyond shameful, morally bankrupt more like!

  • IanColgan says:

    This government is interfering,because the insurers have asked them to ,all behind closed doors!!
    All down to the power of the insurance lobby.
    Why should this government interfere in what is a commercial matter.

  • Geralvin says:

    This is completed unacceptable. The gov. said the proposed whiplash reform will reduce the insurance premium and now they said that they won’t intervene.


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Five key issues to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech

As generative AI starts to play a bigger role in our working lives, there are some key issues that your law firm needs to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech.


Bulk litigation – not always working in consumers interests

For consumers to get the benefit, bulk litigation needs to be done well, and we are increasingly concerned that there are significant problems in some areas of this market.


ABSs, cost and audits – fixing regulation after Axiom Ince

A feature of law firm collapses and frauds has sometimes been the over-concentration of power in outdated and overburdened systems of control.


Loading animation