Legal Services Board mulls extending reach into unregulated market


Will writing: one of the areas set for detailed examination

Will writing: one of the areas set for detailed examination

The Legal Services Board (LSB) has begun work on whether it could and should introduce a voluntary regulation scheme for currently unregulated legal services providers.

As part of a wider package of work on unregulated providers, it is also to investigate in depth their role in the will writing and estate administration, family law, and intellectual property markets.

The lack of a level playing field between the regulated and unregulated communities is a running sore in the world of legal regulation and earlier this year the LSB committed to understanding the latter better.

However, any move into regulating the unregulated does not necessarily mean introducing a structure similar to the one lawyers are currently subject to – it may be deemed appropriate, for example, that access to redress through the Legal Ombudsman may be enough regulation for a particular sector.

The project has four objectives: advancing the LSB’s understanding of the choices and decisions that consumers make when they have a legal problem; analyzing the benefits and risks presented by profit-making unregulated providers; providing an evidence base; and informing an in-principle decision on whether it should seek to extend consumer protection to any unregulated providers.

Under section 163 of the Legal Services Act 2007, the LSB can “enter into arrangements with any person under which the board is to provide assistance for the purpose of improving standards of service and promoting best practice in connection with the carrying on of any legal activity”.

Such arrangements may, among other things, enable to board to advise on best regulatory practice, and the contents of codes of practice.

Initially the goal is simply to establish what scope this provision gives the LSB “to extend its remit to cover those using unregulated providers”, newly published board papers said.

At its meeting in April 2016, the board will be asked to decide whether there is, in principle, a “compelling case for extending consumer protection to any segments of the unregulated legal services market”, and then whether the use of voluntary arrangements under section 163 should be properly scoped out.

Consultancy Economic Insight has been commissioned to carry out the detailed supply side analysis of unregulated providers in will writing and estate administration, family law, and intellectual property, after the LSB decided that its budget did not stretch to including employment law as well.

“Focusing on these three consumer problem types will mean that the report will cover a breadth of areas, providers servicing both individual and small business consumers, and a range of different types of unregulated providers,” the papers said.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Five key issues to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech

As generative AI starts to play a bigger role in our working lives, there are some key issues that your law firm needs to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech.


Bulk litigation – not always working in consumers interests

For consumers to get the benefit, bulk litigation needs to be done well, and we are increasingly concerned that there are significant problems in some areas of this market.


ABSs, cost and audits – fixing regulation after Axiom Ince

A feature of law firm collapses and frauds has sometimes been the over-concentration of power in outdated and overburdened systems of control.


Loading animation