Claimant lawyers urge colleagues to tell SRA about firms running bogus holiday sickness claims


Twambley: sick of law firms that take on bogus claims

Claimant personal injury lawyers yesterday urged their colleagues to report law firms bringing fake holiday sickness claims after it emerged that the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) is investigating around 15 reports of potential misconduct.

Access to Justice, the group that uncovered the figure, said it was “sick of law firms” that take on bogus claims.

Over the past year, the travel industry has ramped up warnings about the rise in holiday sickness claims, arguing that claimant solicitors saw them as ‘the new whiplash’.

In April, the Foreign Office amended its advice to holidaymakers visiting Spain to highlight the dangers of claims management companies (CMC) that encourage them to make false compensation claims, while two months earlier the Claims Management Regulator said relationships between CMCs and solicitors over holiday sickness claims were under investigation.

The figure of 15 reports, however, is a tiny proportion of the 11,000 tip-offs about potential misconduct that the SRA receives in total each year.

The move appears to be part of Access to Justice’s broader campaign against further personal injury reform by demonstrating that the profession is tough on fraud.

Spokesman Andrew Twambley, the well-known claimant solicitor, said his members were “sick and tired of claims touts, but equally sick of law firms that are happy to take on claims knowing that they are fake, which brings the whole industry into disrepute”.

He continued: “We need collective action to help the SRA address any firms that are acting in this way, by providing the information to get claimant law firms exposed, and investigated by the regulator.”

Mr Twambley urged the new government to take more action on cold calling by accelerating the recommendations of the Brady Review on CMC regulation, the Insurance Fraud Taskforce Report and the nuisance calls hotline.

“This adds up to a comprehensive package of measures, especially when placed alongside the SRA commitment to taking action when there is evidence of misconduct.

“We also need insurers, travel operators and law enforcement agencies to take a much more aggressive approach to prosecutions.”

Tags:




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Five key issues to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech

As generative AI starts to play a bigger role in our working lives, there are some key issues that your law firm needs to consider when adopting an AI-based legal tech.


Bulk litigation – not always working in consumers interests

For consumers to get the benefit, bulk litigation needs to be done well, and we are increasingly concerned that there are significant problems in some areas of this market.


ABSs, cost and audits – fixing regulation after Axiom Ince

A feature of law firm collapses and frauds has sometimes been the over-concentration of power in outdated and overburdened systems of control.


Loading animation